My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1994 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1994
>
06-22-1994 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2013 2:59:35 PM
Creation date
10/9/2013 2:57:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JUNE 9, 1994 <br />2, and asked if that showed on the plans, which it did <br />not. <br />DeLonais reported that the Vadnais Heights' City <br />Administrator has informed staff that Vadnais Heights <br />would like to see a separated path along Vadnais Blvd. <br />running up to Rice Street, or the Water Works property <br />at a minimum. <br />Remerowski pointed out that such a path would disturb <br />quite a few trees. Remerowski indicated that Vadnais <br />Blvd. is a wide road with a striped bike path now. <br />DeLonais expressed concern about four driveway accesses <br />to Twin Lake Blvd. for Lots 1 through 4, Block 2 since <br />the driveways would be near the intersection of Twin <br />Lake Blvd. and Vadnais Blvd. <br />Keis stated that based on the plat presented this <br />evening, he assumes that four separate driveways are <br />planned for Lots 1 through 4. Keis felt that was <br />acceptable. Keis questioned whether or not the <br />Planning Commission had any input into the use of <br />Outlot A. <br />Remerowski thought that the City Council could address <br />the outlot issue, suggesting that there may be a better <br />explanation of the use of the outlot when the matter is <br />reviewed by the Council. <br />Mr. Keis recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat <br />for the Twin Lake Pines Addition as submitted this <br />evening showing 14 single - family lots as well as Outlot <br />A provided that there are individual driveways for Lots <br />1, 2, 3, 4, Block 2, and recommending approval of the <br />Variance for cul -de -sac length exceeding 600 feet. <br />Motion seconded by Garske. <br />Motion carried 4 - 0. <br />A property owner asked how many feet back from the <br />high -water mark must remain undisturbed, and how the <br />City could enforce this. <br />Garske suggested that this was something the DNR would <br />enforce. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.