My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-28-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
06-28-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 11:23:00 AM
Creation date
10/22/2013 11:19:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 22, 1994 <br />One property owner reported that he had a water problem <br />in his basement ever since the County Road C <br />improvement was done. That property owner asked if the <br />problem would be increased once Lakeshore is improved. <br />Jim Gregor, property owner on Australian, was concerned <br />that last year Lakeshore was posted with 5 ton weight <br />limits, and this year it is posted at 7 ton. Gregor <br />asked if the increased weight would contribute to the <br />deterioration of the street. <br />The Public Works Superintendent reported that City <br />policy is to post a residential street with curb and <br />gutter at 5 ton, and one without at 3 ton. <br />Lakeshore /Old County Road C /Jackson were constructed to <br />heavier standards, therefore, able to handle more <br />weight than the standard residential street. The <br />Superintendent felt that the streets were posted at the <br />same limits over the past five years. <br />One property owner in the area reported that she had a <br />ditch in her front yard, and would like to see the <br />ditch eliminated as part of the improvement. The <br />property owner felt the ditches were hazardous to <br />children in the area. <br />The City Engineer reported that ditches are removed as <br />part of an urban street improvement.. <br />The City Administrator pointed out that the majority of <br />the property owners have indicated that they would not <br />prefer that option. <br />The property owner indicated that she would prefer not <br />to have curb and gutter, but would like to see the <br />ditch in her front yard eliminated. <br />Morelan reported that curb and gutter is the only <br />realistic way of eliminating the ditches. <br />Rich Windlund indicated that he currently has a water <br />problem in his backyard and would like to see that <br />corrected. <br />Scalze asked if any of the property owners were in <br />favor of curb and gutter. All responded that they <br />opposed curb and gutter, with the exception of one who <br />37 <br />Page 112 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.