Laserfiche WebLink
ANALYSIS <br />There are numerous alternative approaches which are utilized by communities in an attempt to <br />protect neighborhood property values through a regulation of structure design. Some of these <br />relate to housing alone, and others relate to all types of buildings. We found no Ordinances which <br />have attempted to regulate house moving only, at least from the architectural standpoint. In our <br />view, this is consistent with the concern that there is no effective difference between allowing a <br />house of a particular size and architectural style to be moved onto a site, or built on a site from <br />the ground up. There are Ordinances relating to the moving of houses which address certain <br />maintenance items, such as siding and roofing. However, as you may recall, the Graf proposal <br />included an intent to re-side and re-roof the house, in addition to an addition and new mechanical <br />improvements. As a result, these requirements alone would not be enough to accomplish the <br />Council's objective. <br />The following is a listing of several alternatives which may address aspects of the community's <br />concern. <br />1. Appearance Codes: In addressing the issue of aesthetic quality, several non - Minnesota <br />communities have adopted "appearance codes" (Planning Advisory Service Report 379) <br />Such codes regulate the exterior design of multiple family, commercial and industrial uses <br />within the applicable community. Unfortunately, almost all of these appearance codes <br />have made exceptions for single family residential uses. Thus, such a code would not <br />adequately respond to the concerns being voiced by the City. In adapting such a code to <br />Little Canada, it would be necessary to designate a person or board to review compliance <br />with housing appearance, as well as to establish a somewhat objective list of code <br />standards which would guide both property owners and the reviewer. This alternative is <br />on the high end of the comparative complexity of the alternatives discussed. <br />2. Residential Zoning Districts. In an attempt to promote higher value homes in certain <br />areas of the community, the City of Lino Lakes has established a specialized "Executive <br />Residential Zoning District ". The district specifically imposes minimum outside floor <br />dimensions for various housing styles which are larger than the City's "regular" single <br />family home district. Such dimensions exceed building code requirements and are <br />intended to promote high value home construction. While the Lino Lakes district <br />provisions do not address dwelling unit aesthetics per se, its similar application in Little <br />Canada would address the issue of building size and scale. An alternative approach <br />utilized by some communities is a large lot single family zoning district which is intended <br />to accomplish the same result. This latter option has little applicability to Little Canada <br />in that most of the land in the City is already platted. The development of a new Zoning <br />Ordinance District would require some front end research in determining which <br />neighborhoods would be appropriate for the new District and what sizes to establish. <br />However, its application would be one of the simplest of the alternatives we have found. <br />Page 28 <br />