Laserfiche WebLink
Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. <br />C O M M U N I T Y P L A N N I N G • D E S I G N • M A R K E T R E S E A R C H <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Little Canada Planning Commission <br />FROM: Stephen Grittman <br />DATE: August 8, 1995 <br />RE: Little Canada - Architectural Controls in the Commercial Districts <br />FILE NO: 758.10 - 95.10 <br />We have spent some time researching the most commonly used means of controlling aesthetic <br />issues in commercial districts. Some of these are aimed purely at aesthetic regulation, while <br />others control all aspects of architectural style. An example of the latter would be historic <br />preservation districts which are designed to retain specific elements of the existing architectural <br />streetscape, and require new structures to conform to the existing style. An example of the former <br />would be sign code regulation, or Little Canada's current building materials ordinance, which <br />address appearance, but not architecture itself. <br />Following is a brief description of the alternative methods of regulation, generally in increasing <br />order of complexity. Some of these are currently employed by the City of Little Canada under <br />the current Zoning Ordinance. <br />1. Sign Codes. Little Canada's current Ordinance regulates signs through limits on height, <br />area, and setback. Although signs are not architecture per se, they do have a large impact <br />on the aesthetic impression of the streetscape, sometimes even dominating the view of the <br />commercial district. This is true in portions of the Rice Street Corridor currently. <br />Additional sign controls which are commonly employed include materials controls which <br />reflect the buildings in the area. Some communities require signage which is consistent <br />with a common theme, such as monument style signs, rather than pylon signs. <br />5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595- 9636•Fax. 595 -9837 <br />Page 82 <br />