My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-25-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
01-25-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2014 2:20:44 PM
Creation date
1/10/2014 2:18:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JANUARY 12, 1995 <br />PUD & <br />PRELIMINARY <br />PLAT - <br />REAL ESTATE <br />MASTERS <br />The City Planner replied that he did not have any <br />grounds for denial. <br />Knudsen pointed out that the Ordinance does not give <br />any latitude to judge whether or not the structure <br />would fit into the neighborhood. <br />Keis stated that he was not pleased with the proposal, <br />but it appears there is nothing the Planning Commission <br />can do but recommend approval. <br />Schletty pointed out that this is the second <br />application for a CUP to move a house into the City <br />within the last couple of months. Schletty was <br />concerned that it appears there are no checks and <br />balances in these situations. Schletty felt it would <br />have been better if the applicant had submitted a <br />detailed blueprint showing landscaping and giving the <br />neighborhood a visual idea of what the house would look <br />like. <br />Garske asked if this house would be subject to the same <br />landscaping requirements as new construction. <br />The City Planner replied that it would. <br />Mr. Knudsen recommended approval of a Conditional Use <br />Permit to move an existing house into the City on a lot <br />located at 256 Twin Lake Road as requested by Jason and <br />Tia Graf subject to compliance with the recommendations <br />of the Building Inspector and the City Planner as <br />contained in his January 9th report. <br />Motion seconded by Carson. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />Mr. Don Newpower, Real Estate Masters, appeared before <br />the Commission requesting approval of a Planned Unit <br />Development to allow more than one owner - occupied <br />office building on a lot, as well as a Preliminary <br />Plat for eight (8) office building sites on Lots 1 and <br />3, Heritage Office Park. Newpower reported that he has <br />reviewed the Planner's report dated January 9th, and <br />noted recommendation #3 regarding NSP. Newpower <br />reported that they are proposing garages at the back of <br />the buildings. This has been discussed with NSP, and <br />9 <br />Page 82 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.