My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-1995 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
04-26-1995 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 10:31:02 AM
Creation date
2/12/2014 2:55:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />APRIL 13, 1995 <br />Motion seconded by Knudsen. <br />Motion carried 4 to 2 (Garske and Schletty voted <br />against). <br />NUMBER OF The City Planner reported that there are two clauses <br />VOTES TO in the Subdivision Code which the City Attorney has <br />APPROVE indicated are in conflict with regard to the number <br />VARIANCES of votes necessary to approve variances to that Code. <br />AND CUP'S At a recent meeting, the Council clarified the language <br />TO THE to eliminate the conflict. Variances to the <br />ZONING & Subdivision Code require a simple majority vote of the <br />SUBDIVISION Council. Both Variances and Conditional Use Permits to <br />CODES the Zoning Code require a super majority vote of the <br />Council. The Planner reported that the Council has <br />asked that the Planning Commission look at this issue <br />and recommend whether these approvals should be by <br />simple or super majority. The Planner pointed out the <br />survey done by City staff showing that the vast <br />majority of cities in the surrounding area require <br />simple majorities for these approvals. However, it <br />would not be out -of -line with what Metro cities are <br />doing to require super majority votes on these issues. <br />The Commission discussed this matter, and it was <br />pointed out that under a super majority two people on <br />the Council have the ability to control these matters. <br />Therefore, it was the consensus of the Commission that <br />a simple majority vote for Variances to the Subdivision <br />Code as well as Variances and Conditional Use Permits <br />to the Zoning Code would be more appropriate. <br />Mr. Knudsen recommended that a simple majority vote of <br />the City Council be required for Variances to the <br />Subdivision Code as well as Variances and Conditional <br />Use Permits to the Zoning Code. <br />Motion seconded by Carson. <br />Motion carried 6 - 0. <br />BUILDING The Commission reviewed the Building Ordinance <br />ORDINANCE revisions proposed by the Building Inspector. It was <br />REVISIONS noted that these revisions bring the Ordinance into <br />compliance with the actual practices of the City. <br />12 <br />Page 37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.