Laserfiche WebLink
921.010 C. The Planning Commission shall consider possible adverse affects to the <br />proposed amendment or conditional use. Its judgment shall be based upon (but not <br />limited to) the following factors: <br />1. The applicant shall demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the <br />proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and <br />provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan. <br />2. The applicant shall demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the <br />proposed site is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the <br />area. <br />3. The applicant shall demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the <br />proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein. <br />4. The applicant shall demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the <br />proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the aggregate property values <br />in the area in which the amendment or conditional use is proposed. <br />5. The applicant shall demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the <br />proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not <br />overburden the City's service capacity. <br />6. The applicant shall demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the <br />development of the conditional use shall reflect the architectural character of the <br />conforming buildings in the surrounding area in regard to the following: <br />a. Proportion, scale and roof line; <br />b. Architectural style; and <br />c. Exterior finish materials. <br />For the proposed rezoning, the nature of the use will be consistent with the current <br />zoning and and use of the site, that is, industrial use. Industrial uses are dominated by <br />activities that involve processing, construction, and often heavy truck traffic and use. <br />The remaining factors would be requirements of the development plan, and would be <br />enforced at the time of construction. <br />Summary and Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the rezoning, with the note that conformance with the <br />rezoning requirements will require further review of architecture and design aspects of <br />the buildings and site as construction gets underway. However, the essential land use <br />appears to conform to the existing and proposed land use plan, being industrial in <br />nature. Although the owner and operator of the site would change to a public entity, the <br />activity on the site would be expected to be similar to that allowed under the current <br />Industrial Park zoning designation. <br />pc: Kathy Glanzer <br />Steve Westerhaus <br />Lee Elfering <br />3 <br />