Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 12, 2014 <br />The Administrator reported that in considering the project, one of the <br />committee's goals was to have all City equipment stored indoors at one <br />site. Currently we use about 14,000 square feet for equipment storage <br />when you consider the current Public Works and Parks shops plus storage <br />at the former Roseville Plumbing building. In touring other public works <br />facilities, it also became evident that having drive- through capabilities for <br />equipment was preferred and would improve efficiencies of the public <br />works /parks operation. <br />The Administrator then reviewed the proposed site plan for the project, <br />which was considered at the February 7th Special Council meeting. The <br />Administrator noted that the square footage for the building is proposed at <br />just over 26,000 square feet, and increased the estimated cost of the <br />project by $800,000. The Administrator estimated that total project costs <br />including land are now at approximately $4 million, which he noted one <br />resident had suggested would be the cost of the project. The <br />Administrator acknowledged that the City's initial estimates were too low <br />given the building's configuration. He also pointed out that the project <br />has yet to be bid, and the City is working to refine the project and <br />estimates. <br />The Administrator noted that to proceed with the project as proposed by <br />the design committee would require either an increase in the bonding for <br />the project, or the City could use its cash for the additional cost. In <br />discussing this with the City's Financial Advisor, Ehlers & Associates, the <br />City has the ability to issue Water and Sewer Bonds to make up the <br />difference rather than additional Capital Improvement Bonds. The <br />rationale for this approach is to borrow money at low rates for 20 years <br />versus using cash reserves. <br />The Administrator then mentioned that comments have been made which <br />suggested that the City should have purchased the former D & T Trucking <br />site for its new Public Works /Parks Facility. D & T Trucking was asking <br />$4 million for a building that was just under 26,000 square feet. That <br />building has approximately 18,400 square feet in vehicle storage area and <br />7,200 square feet in office area, which is more office space than necessary <br />for the City's use. The Administrator further noted that the proposed <br />layout of the new facility is better and will be more efficient for the City's <br />operations than the D & T Trucking building would have been. <br />With regard to the additional cost of the project, the Administrator again <br />noted that the City could use cash, but emphasized the advantage to selling <br />a bond that would spread the financing of the project out over the next 20 <br />years. The Administrator reported that the debt service on the bond issue <br />4 <br />