Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 23, 2014 <br />lounge, and these individuals are told that sampling is not allowed in the <br />City. The request then changes to a request for a tobacco store. <br />Blesener noted the efforts that the State Legislature is making relative to e- <br />cigarettes and that the City Code was amended to address delivery <br />devices. The Administrator indicated that the City Attorney did present a <br />Tobacco Ordinance amendment addressing delivery devices, which was <br />adopted by the Council. <br />Blesener asked the City Planner for his comments. The City Planner <br />indicated that some of the cities he has worked with have addressed the <br />issue of sampling. <br />Keis noted that the current ordinance prohibits sampling. I Ie indicated <br />that the issue was the likelihood of a head shop locating in the City. The <br />City Administrator indicated that he was recently at a gas <br />station /convenience store in another city that had paraphernalia on display <br />that could be used for other purposes than the smoking of tobacco. <br />McGraw noted that the State is struggling with the e- cigarette and delivery <br />system issue. He indicated that he would rather be proactive on this issue <br />and limit the number of tobacco store licenses and prevent a head shop <br />from locating in the City. Keis stated that he was torn on the issue. <br />Blesener suggested that City staff put together a proposed ordinance <br />amendment limiting tobacco store licenses to two and lifting the limitation <br />on the number of general tobacco licenses. That proposed amendment <br />should be presented to the full Council at their next meeting. The City <br />Administrator indicated that he would also ask the City Attorney for his <br />comments on the proposed amendment. <br />DEPARTMENT The City Administrator reported that the Department of Revenue <br />OF REVENUE contacted the City last year to review its organized collection program <br />APPEAL relative to the payment of taxes. The Administrator indicated that under <br />the Organized Collection Contract, the haulers are responsible for <br />remitting taxes while the City bills residents for organized collection <br />services. The Administrator noted that the haulers are current on those tax <br />payments. The Administrator reported that there is a State Statute that <br />says whoever bills for services must remit the taxes. The Administrator <br />indicated that the issue is complicated further in that recycling services is <br />exempt from sales tax, but the City's invoices do not break out recycling <br />as a separate line item. Because of this, it is the Department of Revenue's <br />position that sales tax is owed on the recycling charges. The <br />Administrator indicated that the Department of Revenue is saying that the <br />10 <br />