My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-23-2014 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
04-23-2014 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2014 11:28:24 AM
Creation date
5/6/2014 11:28:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 23, 2014 <br />Blesener pointed out that this is a big issue for the City given it has six <br />crossings in two miles, resulting in an almost continuous horn when a train <br />passes through the City. <br />The Administrator again noted that the Quiet Zone Study will be <br />presented at the Council's May 14`1' meeting. <br />MET COUNCIL The City Planner reviewed a draft letter to be submitted to the <br />POPULATION Metropolitan Council in response to their Thrive MSP 2040 population <br />PROJECTIONS projections for the City of Little Canada. The Planner noted that last fall <br />the Met Council published preliminary population numbers that projected <br />a significant increase for Little Canada. The City raised objections, and <br />the Met Council has come back with even higher numbers. The Met <br />Council Thrive MSP 2040 projections show a 40% population increase for <br />Little Canada. The Planner indicated that part of the Met Council's <br />rational for this level of increase relates to their transportation plan and <br />that cities should plan for growth around transit corridors. The Met <br />Council Transportation Policy Plan suggests that the Rush Line transit <br />corridor may be one where new transit service could be planned. The <br />Planner noted that it is yet undetermined if the Rush Line will prove to be <br />a viable transit corridor, or if so, where it would fall on the list of priorities <br />for the region. The Planner also noted that the City does not have <br />available land to develop and there is no connection between the <br />population numbers projected by Met Council and realistic development. <br />The Planner noted that in the draft letter he is asking that the Met Council <br />return to their 2030 population projections for Little Canada. <br />McGraw asked the consequences of not complying with Met Council <br />population projections. The City Planner indicated that the Met Council <br />will want these population projections addressed in the City's next <br />Comprehensive Plan update that is due in 2018. The Planner stated that <br />this is where the conflict will begin because there is no functional way for <br />the City to meet these numbers. The Planner stated that another conflict <br />will arise in that Met Council classifies Little Canada as a suburban <br />community and their policy requirement is that new growth should <br />achieve a density of 5 units per acre. The Met Council 2030 classification <br />indicates 3 units per acre. The Met Council is also projecting that <br />employment in the City will increase by 3,300 jobs, which is a 60% <br />increase. <br />Blesener noted that the only way to achieve the population projections <br />would be to redevelop with high -rise apartments and eliminate single- <br />family residential. The Planner indicated that because the projections are <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.