My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-2014 Council Agenda
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
06-11-2014 Council Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2014 3:16:44 PM
Creation date
6/6/2014 3:09:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
188
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
May 23, 2014 <br />Page 7 <br />Formal franchise renewal <br />• franchise fees charged at the maximum tate resulting in continued <br />franchise fee payments of approximately $1.5 million per year to the <br />NSCC; <br />• $27.7 million over 10 years in support for PEC access•—a demand <br />that would result in PEC fees increasing to $7.57 per customer per <br />month ($13.5 million of that $27.7 million is to pay for operations, <br />which the NSCC now apparently agrees it could not require under <br />federal law); <br />• that Comcast provide the NSCC with and maintain a $7.4 million <br />data and telecommunications network ("the I -Net") for free—an in- <br />kind demand that is also unlawful; <br />• eight standard -definition PEG channels and an additional four <br />channels in high-definition format from Comcast's network, and an <br />unspecified quantity of video -on -demand capacity (all without a <br />showing that those channels are necessary or capable of use by the <br />NSAC). <br />In its staff report, the NSCC found no instance in which Comcast was in <br />substantial breach of a material provision of the existing franchises. The staff <br />report also found overall that Comcast's customer service was good or very <br />good and the staff made no finding that Comcast did not possess the legal, <br />technical, or financial qualifications to meet the demands of the NSCC's <br />proposal. <br />On August 1, 2013—after the NSCC's staff or Franchise Renewal <br />Committee issued the NSCC's RFRP to Comcast—the full NSCC summarily <br />adopted the staff report, consultant reports, and RFRP. Presumably at the <br />advice of the NSCC's counsel, the Chairman of the NSCC suggested that the <br />commissioners not make any statements or discussions about these <br />documents or anything related to the adopted community needs assessment <br />and Comcast review; all such discussions, to the extent there were to be any, <br />were conducted privately, presumably. <br />D. Comcast's Proposal <br />In response to the NSCC's RFRP Comcast submitted its franchise <br />renewal proposal on December 20, 2013, offering the following, among other <br />things: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.