Laserfiche WebLink
May 23, 2014 <br />Page 19 <br />Formal franchise renewal <br />kind support, must be maintained and enhanced as described herein and in the <br />,Staff Reports" (RFRP at p.38) The RFRP was built on this unlawful premise, <br />and the NSCC has tried to use the formal process to put pressure on Comcast <br />to acquiesce to that unlawful demand. It was a gamble—a misguided gamble <br />that the cities will have to live with if they accept the NSCC's recommenda- <br />tion. <br />B. Untimely supplemental staff reports <br />The NSCC staff, again behind closed doors, put together supplemental <br />staff and consultant reports that purportedly set forth further review of <br />Comcast's performance and community reeds. The NSCC's staff had <br />Comcast's proposal in hand for five months and yet waited until less than one <br />week before it voted on a resolution to make its supplemental reports public <br />and give copies to Comcast. Comcast objected to the use by the NSCC of <br />these untimely reports as part of its ascertainment or review or Comcast's past <br />performance. <br />Comcast has also objected to the way the Supplemental Staff Reports <br />were purportedly "incorporated" into the resolution recommending denial, <br />and to the resolution's lack of specificity as to the basis for denial. The <br />resolution should have precisely stated the ground(s) on which denial is based. <br />Comcast is entitled to know those grounds and the cities, one would hope, <br />would be interested in the same thing. A better -drafted resolution would make <br />the administrative process more cost-effective for all concerned because it <br />would help focus evidence -gathering. Comcast requested actual findings <br />stating the NSCC's reasons at the May 15 hearing, but the commissioners <br />declined to elaborate. <br />In addition, the Reports and previous staff comments are tinged with <br />antagonistic rhetoric and improper motivations, including: <br />• an argument that Comcast cannot charge the fair value for the 1 -Net <br />because it would "serve to enrich Comcast's profits" (Supp. R. at 3); <br />• a rationalization of the NSCC's demand for the 1 -Net based on <br />merely saving the government from having paying for services <br />unrelated to cable; (Supp. R. at 2) <br />• an argument that Comcast should fund NSAC vocational training for <br />videographers through NSCC franchising conditions, (Supp. R. at 6); <br />