My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-25-07 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
04-25-07 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:21:22 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 2:10:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />APRIL 25, 2007 <br />developer can then take that input and use it in developing a preliminary <br />plat along with engineering, wetland, drainage, etc. information. <br />Blesener stated that he was willing to allow a cul-de-sac longer than 500 <br />feet if road access can be provided to the east and west. <br />McGraw stated that his reservation in acting on the concept is the lack of <br />wetland information at this point. McGraw stated that he did not want to <br />mislead the developer nor the neighboring property owners. <br />The City Administrator noted that the concept review allows the City to <br />set some guidelines without binding itself or the developer. It provides the <br />developer with some preliminary indication of the City's development <br />preferences. <br />Blesener stated that if the wetland delineation shows there is developable <br />property to the east and the west, then he wants the future road <br />connections. With those connections, he was willing to approve a cul-de- <br />sac longer than 500 feet. Blesener stated that his position was that <br />everything else will have to meet ordinance. <br />Soby again stated that they are aware that Richie Place will have to <br />comply with Watershed requirements, and indicated that they are only <br />seeking concept approval subject to requirements. Soby stated that they <br />are aware that the plat could change and the number of lots reduced as <br />they move to preliminary plat and must comply with engineering and <br />Watershed requirements. Soby noted that the questions raised this <br />evening are typical discussion at the preliminary plat level. <br />Allan stated that she agrees with the concerns raised by the neighbors. <br />She noted that this is an environmentally sensitive neighborhood. Allan <br />felt that limiting the cul-de-sac to 500 feet did not preclude its future <br />extension when the properties to the east and west are developed. Allan <br />stated that she preferred the 121ot proposal, noting that the addition of <br />stub roads in that proposal may result in the loss of 1 lot. Allan did not <br />support the 1,000 foot cul-de-sac with 161ots. <br />Soby again noted that it was typical to measure cul-de-sac length at the <br />stub road connection. The City Planner stated that the Code provides for <br />measuring this cul-de-sac length from LaBore Road. At the time the stub <br />roads are constructed, any resulting cul-de-sac would be measured from <br />the stub road connection. Allan noted that under the City's Code a <br />variance would be required for the proposed cul-de-sac. Allan noted The <br />Preserve development, and the City's requirement for a second road <br />connection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.