07-23-2014 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL JULY 23, 2014 Planner noted that the applicant was not present at the Planning Commission to present the proposal. Therefore, the Planning Commission recommended denial of the PUD Permit so that the application could be passed on to the Council. The Planner noted that the most recent two -unit proposal appears to meet Zoning setback requirements based on the survey submitted. He noted, however, that three garage spaces have been proposed for this two -unit structure. The Code requires two off-street parking spaces per unit, which this proposal provides. The Planner pointed out that it has been the practice of the City to require two garage spaces per unit, which is not the case in this proposal. The Planner noted that this is not a Code requirement, however. Tom McManus, Thomas Homes, appeared before the Council and reported that their proposal for a duplex meets the City's setback requirements and Shoreland Ordinance. McManus felt their proposal was worthy of consideration and serves the needs of families that live together. He noted that he understands the requirement that this housing be restricted to individuals aged 55 and older. McManus indicated that the proposal solves a series of problems for this property. These solutions include a turn -around so that vehicles are not backing onto Little Canada Road. The grade of the property will be brought up to Little Canada Road. The proposed duplex will have the appearance of a large estate -style home. He noted the Planner's comments about the City's practice of requiring two garage stalls per living unit, and indicated that they are proposing three garages as they felt four garages in the front of this duplex would have the appearance of a convenience store. McManus indicated that they would like the house to have a residential appearance. McManus pointed out that the house would be owner -occupied with the owner occupying one unit and renting the other unit to a relative that might require some care. He noted that this concept allows for care of a relative while maintaining separate living quarters. McManus stated that this living concept has been successful in other communities. McManus stated that he hoped this proposal could be a contribution to the City and asked for PUD Permit approval. Montour asked for clarification of the ownership. McManus indicated that the house may be occupied by parents living with children or a combination of related people. He noted that there are situations of parents living with children in single-family homes. This concept allows for separate living quarters. Keis asked if there would be a separate entrance for each unit. McManus replied that there would be. He noted the front entrance to the lower unit 6