Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 8, 2007 <br />levied any fines as of yet. The Administrator suggested that the Burnsville <br />City Council may be giving the apartment complex ownership a period of <br />time to get their act together before implementing fines. <br />Molly Grove indicated that the intent of these ordinances is to go after the <br />people who are problems while keeping fees to a minimum or nothing. If <br />a complex loses its exemption, then it would be required to pay a license <br />fee for the year. Grove suggested that license fees have been kept low or <br />not implemented unless there is the loss of an exemption, since the intent <br />would be to not take money from the ownership that could be put toward <br />the maintenance of the complex. <br />Keis noted the STAR Program outlined in the ordinance, and asked how <br />many violations a complex could have before this designation is <br />withdrawn. The City Administrator reviewed the STAR Program <br />requirements as well as the "Three Strikes and You're Out" clause which <br />requires that tenants be removed from the property for three violations <br />within a twelve (12) month period. <br />The City Administrator reviewed Chapter 3200.050. EXCEPTION, noting <br />that rented rooms in owner-occupied dwelling units are exempted from the <br />ordinance. He also asked about the rental of condominium units. It was <br />the consensus of the Council to exempt rented rooms in owner-occupied <br />dwelling units, but not exempt rented condominium units. McGraw <br />pointed out that including rented condominium units in the ordinance <br />would help owners get rid of problem tenants. <br />Keis asked about the 3 violations within a 12 month period, asking if this <br />was a calendar year. The Administrator clarified that it was a running 12 <br />month period. <br />Keis questioned 3200.060.D. that code violations must be remedied in a <br />timely fashion. The Administrator indicated that the time frame for <br />correcting a code violation would be dependent on the violation. The <br />Deputy Fire Marshal indicated that a life safety violation would have to be <br />corrected immediately. Other work may be eligible fora 30 to 90 day <br />correction period. The Deputy Fire Marshal indicated that in the case <br />where a property owner is making progress on a correction and calls and <br />asks for an extension, that extension may be granted depending on the <br />circumstances. <br />The Administrator noted that 3200.060.B. would allow for a waiver of a <br />City inspection if the property owner provides copies of HUD inspection <br />reports. The Administrator also pointed out that from time-to-time the <br />City gets calls from tenants that management is not addressing a code <br />problem, and suggested that the ordinance include language to address this <br />