Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />AUGUST 18, 2014 <br />keeping the property maintained were reasonable requests on the part of <br />the adjacent property owners. <br />Montour felt the situation was primarily that of Poolside being a good <br />neighbor. Montour stated that he would like to see Poolside provide a <br />timeline and a business plan for compliance with the recommendations. <br />Blesener suggested that action be tabled on the PUD requests pending <br />receipt of that information. <br />Dorn noted that the City's code enforcement is complaint based. He asked <br />the Council to review all the pictures that he submitted. He also noted that <br />past practice has been that Poolside does not maintain their property <br />unless the City receives complaints. <br />McGraw indicated that once the City has this timetable in place, it will be <br />a tool that the Code Enforcement Officer can use to ensure compliance. <br />McGraw felt that the business should be given a chance to rectify its <br />problems. He indicated that the City will look at the pictures and <br />suggested that the neighbors take additional pictures if problems continue. <br />McGraw pointed out to Anderson that Poolside must make sure that <br />delivery trucks are not parked on Jackson Street and that the road is not <br />blocked. <br />Dorn noted that there are no parking signs on the street. He also indicated <br />that there is a tenant in the building at Little Canada Road that has a lot of <br />trailers and other equipment parked as well as semis backing in and out <br />that block the road. It is his understanding that the business may be <br />corning in for a permit for outdoor storage. <br />The City Attorney recommended that the Council close the public hearing <br />and table action on the PUD requests pending the additional information <br />to be submitted by Poolside. There was discussion about the 60 -day time <br />period for City review, and it was noted that this matter can be tabled to <br />the September 10, 2014 meeting and still fall within the 60 -day review <br />period. <br />There was no one else at the meeting wishing to comment on this matter. <br />Upon motion by Montour, seconded by Boss, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Montour introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2014-8-155 — CLOSING THE PUBLIC HEARING <br />AND TABLING ACTION ON THE AMENDMENT TO PUD -C <br />9 <br />