01-14-2015 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Joel Hanson From: Gade, Dale (DOT) <Dale.Gade@state.mn.us> Sent: Friday, January 09, 2015 10:17 AM To: Joel Hanson Cc: Kauppi, Sheila (DOT) Subject: Little Canda MC Attachments: MnDOT noise policy 2011.pdf; SP 6280-379 Map.pdf Joel, Thanks for the opportunity to talk about the MNPASS project with you and your staff. The follow-up I had from the meeting was as follows: Copy of the Noise Wall Policy - (See attached.) It contains the provisions for which we will analyze the noise walls with this project. I know there was interest in the point system for benefiting receptors which is detailed in the policy. If you have any specific questions I can put you into contact with Peter Wasko whom manages the noisewall program for MnDOT. Flyover Bridge/Noisewall — I believe you are speaking about the portion near Twin Lakes. If not please correct me. This portion was studied in for the Unweave and was deemed not cost effective due to the Right of Way needed to construct. This will be revaluated with the 1694 corridors of commerce project as it will most likely be in that protects limits. Funding on Little Canada Rd Bridge - Based on the resolution and commitments Wayne made I will need to look into this further. Noisewall Samples - Samples of the Rinoshield coating system are actually in the field along Canterbury Rd near the apartment complex just west of 35E. They are painted squares that indicate the test/sample sections. Here Is their website with visual samples. http://rhinoshield.net/ This may not ultimately be the product but is one we are evaluating per the American General Contractors (AGC) request. Replace Wall at 36/Canterbury Rd —1 believe you are referring to the wall on the west side of 35E in the north west corner of the TH 36/35E interchange. I have also attached a map showing the walls MnDOT plans to repaint as part of the unweave. (This one is labeled wall A.) Since we are planning to repaint this wall I hope I just miss understood our conversation and a replacement isn't was intended. Let me know what you may have meant on this issue so I can better understand and respond. Staining on Wali/Centerville Rd — Our discussion pertained to staining of the wall and the past resolution also mentioned staining. When I look at the Centerville road wall I do not see what you may be referring to. I have attached a googie street view pic of the wall I believe we discussed. If this isn't the wall or he issue isn't represented let me know. 14