Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />JANUARY 28, 2015 <br />master agreement acknowledging the State Constitution provisions (5.a. <br />and 5.i.), and this agreement then negates the need to rewrite the bond <br />agreement. <br />McKenzie indicated that the estimates from the railroad for the crossing <br />improvements are reasonable, and indicated that these estimates are <br />typically a little high. The City Administrator reported that the estimated <br />costs are approximately $138,000 over the State bond amount and <br />$108,000 over after the State's contribution of $30,000. If the prices come <br />in better than estimate, this will be fewer dollars that the City will be <br />responsible for. <br />McKenzie indicated that there are three issues that are being pursued at <br />this time. The first is getting the MN DOT 5.i. Agreement in place. <br />McKenzie pointed out that the State bonding money for Little Canada <br />amounts to $1.25 million and MN DOT has agreed to contribute an <br />additional $30,000 from their Federal safety funds which should cover the <br />Canadian Pacific's engineering fees. (The use of those funds also <br />provides liability protection associated with the adequacy of the design.) <br />The second issue that is being worked on is getting crossing agreements in <br />place with the Canadian Pacific Railroad. McKenzie hoped that both the <br />MN DOT agreement and the CP agreements would be presented to the <br />Council for approval in February. The third issue relates to submission of <br />the 60 -day notice for the quiet zone. This notice provides a 60 -day time <br />period for MN DOT and the railroad to comment on the improvement <br />design. McKenzie reported that this notice is ready to go and pending the <br />outcome of the workshop, he could submit it yet this week. <br />McKenzie indicated that the improvements will consist of five standard <br />crossing signals and some median work at two of the crossings. He <br />indicated that the Woodlyn Avenue crossing presented a problem relative <br />to the addition of medians given the way the area is used by local <br />businesses. Therefore, the Woodlyn improvement is proposed to consist <br />of four quadrant gates, which eliminate the need for medians. The <br />estimated cost of the Woodlyn improvement is $275,000. McKenzie <br />noted the decision needed on whether or not to close Woodlyn Avenue. <br />He pointed out that if that decision is not made this evening, the process <br />can move forward with the Woodlyn crossing plans modified at a later <br />date. <br />The City Administrator stated that if Woodlyn Avenue is eliminated, there <br />may need to be a legislative amendment relative to the State bond funding. <br />He also suggested that a decision on Woodlyn Avenue should be made <br />sooner rather than later so that the City can get the crossing improvements <br />into the railroad's queue. The Administrator noted that the railroad may <br />be willing to contribute up to $50,000 toward the improvements associated <br />with creating an alternate route to the Woodlyn businesses if the City <br />2 <br />