My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-2015 Additions
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
05-27-2015 Additions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2015 1:21:21 PM
Creation date
5/27/2015 1:21:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Joel Hanson <br />From: Todd Olson <todd.olson@nrg-11c.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 2:50 PM <br />To: Joel Hanson <br />Cc: John Keis <br />Subject: RE: meeting to discuss rail impacts <br />Thank you both for taking the time to meet with me this morning. We look forward to having the Mayor at the Hearing <br />on June 3rd. Right now we don't have any information more than the date of the hearing but we should know more by <br />the end of the week. I will let you know as soon as possible what the window of opportunity is for public comment. Here <br />is a brief description of the project and a few key facts in regards to rail impacts: <br />The Sandpiper Project is an approximately 616 -mile interstate crude oil pipeline that will bring growing supplies of North <br />Dakota crude oil from our Beaver Lodge Station south ofTioga, N.D., to Clearbrook, Minn., and then into an existing <br />Enbridge terminal in Superior, Wis. The Sandpiper pipeline will follow Enbridge's existing Line 81 Pipeline to Clearbrook, <br />the follows existing pipelines and transmission lines south and east to Superior. Subject to receiving applicable permits, <br />Sandpiper will be in service in 2017. <br />On April 13, 2015 the Administrative Law Judge assigned to the Sandpiper Pipeline Project recommended that the MPUC <br />grant a Certificate of Need permit for the Project. This recommendation is significant and the MPUC will make a <br />decision on the Certificate of Need next week. <br />Sandpiper has broad and deep support throughout Minnesota. In January, more than 900 landowners and elected <br />officials along our route, laborers, farmers, business people and more came out en masse to provide direct personal <br />stories as to why this project is needed and how it will benefit Minnesota. They outnumbered opponents by more than a <br />2:1 margin. Approximately 60 Minnesota state legislators, 12 Chambers of Commerce, 6 county commissions and a <br />variety of city, township, farm bureau, economic development groups and agricultural coops signed letters urging <br />support of the Project. Several spoke from personal experience and testified to the company's commitment to safety <br />and environmental stewardship. <br />Sandpiper is important for the State of Minnesota. It will help address rail congestion throughout the state by <br />transporting increased Bakken oil supplies by pipeline. Sandpiper will benefit Northern Minnesota communities with <br />economic stimulus by generating an estimated $25 million in annual property taxes. Sandpiper also will create 1,500 <br />family -sustaining construction jobs while providing an economic boost to the region's businesses during construction. <br />Impacts on rail congestion: <br />• Between 60-70 percent of North Dakota crude oil is transported by rail or truck, much of it <br />through Minnesota. <br />• Sandpiper's capacity of 225,000 barrels leaving North Dakota equals 1,700 rail cars every day. <br />• Rail congestion cost Minnesota agriculture $100 million in reported losses in 2014. Power, <br />mining and paper industries experienced similar rail congestion challenges. <br />• Rail congestion can trap first responders and equipment on the wrong side of the tracks in an <br />emergency. <br />• Oil car traffic increased 4190% in 5 years from 9500 car loads in 2008 to 407,642 cars in 2013. <br />• Sandpiper will free up rail capacity for other products important to Minnesota trade. <br />• Denying the Sandpiper Project would increase the reliance on rail as the primary mode of <br />transportation for Bakken crude oil <br />• Where pipelines are available, they are the preferred mode of transportation for crude oil due to <br />lower costs and more dependable service <br />• Many of Minnesota's major industries rely on the rail system for efficient delivery of goods <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.