05-27-2015 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MAY 27, 2015 materials may be deemed acceptable." rather than "shall be deemed acceptable". Torkelson pointed out that any special purpose fence will be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council, so there is the opportunity for City review. McGraw asked the cost in processing a CUP for a special purpose fence. The City Clerk indicated that the escrow deposit for a CUP of this nature is $500. The applicant would have to pay costs associated with the application which include publication and City Planner review costs. If the costs are under $500 the excess money is returned; if the costs are over, the applicant is billed. McGraw asked for an estimate to have a fence plan certified by a structural engineer. The Planner estimated an engineer's time would be charged at $150 to $200 per hour and a total of 2 to 3 hours. The Planner again noted that there are certified fence plans available for purchase which would be less expensive. Fischer expressed concern that an applicant for this type of special purpose fence would spend approximately $1,000 before obtaining any approvals. The City Planner suggested that an applicant could seek approval for this type of fence before spending the money for engineer - certified fence plans. McGraw and Keis also commented on the high up- front costs, with Keis asking if the Building Official would be able to review these fence plans. Torkelson asked if it were possible for the City to have pre -designed fence templates that homeowners can use. The City Planner was not sure this type of template existed. He noted that fences of this nature are very expensive costing thousands of dollars to construct. The City Administrator suggested that because of the unique situation of properties abutting the railroad, the City could waive the City's deposit. He noted that the City would still incur costs, however. Montour suggested that a couple of generic styles and designs for engineered fences be available from the City. Keis expressed concern with having the City design fences noting that if there are issues with a fence that may be problematic for the City. The Planner again noted that there are certified fence designs available, and the City could have a list of resources of this nature for interested property owners rather than having the City act as the fence designer. Keis felt there would be little demand for these fences. Torkelson suggested that the proposed ordinance be adopted this evening, noting that the City can then revisit the issue when the quiet zones are in place. There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on this matter. 5