My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-27-2015 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
05-27-2015 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2015 1:36:08 PM
Creation date
6/5/2015 1:35:43 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MAY 27, 2015 <br />way given the increased railroad traffic in the City. This citizen has <br />suggested that fences up to 12 feet be allowed in this situation. The <br />Planner indicated that in discussing this at the Planning Commission, it <br />was felt that a fence of this height along one property would not do much <br />to block out noise. The Planner stated that it was indicated that visibility <br />may be just as much of a factor as the noise. <br />The Planner reported that the current ordinance has a provision for special <br />purpose fences by Conditional Use Permit which would allow for a fence <br />height in excess of the 6 '/2 foot maximum allowed by Code. The Planner <br />presented the Council with an ordinance amendment that would establish <br />parameters for special purpose fences along railroad rights-of-way. He <br />noted that a Conditional Use Permit and a building permit would still be <br />required for these fences. The Planner also noted that at its meeting, the <br />Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance <br />amendment with the additional condition that a structural engineer would <br />be required to certify the fence design given the height of the structure. <br />Keis asked if this was something that the Building Official could do. The <br />City Planner indicated that depending on the fence design, the Building <br />Official may be able to sign off on the plans. However, again depending <br />on the fence design, structural certification may be required. The Planner <br />noted that there are fence plans available that come along with structural <br />certifications. Keis asked if obtaining structural certification for a fence <br />plan was expensive. The Planner was not sure of the cost for obtaining a <br />separate engineering certification, and again mentioned that there are plans <br />available with certifications. <br />Torkelson asked if the 12 -foot high fence would be allowed only along the <br />railroad right-of-way. The Planner replied that the 12 feet would be <br />allowed only on the rear or side yard adjoining the railroad right-of-way. <br />Montour asked how the railroad right-of-way would be delineated. The <br />Planner replied that it is not uncommon to require a survey along with a <br />fence permit. Montour asked if permission would be required from the <br />railroad if the fence is placed on the property line. The Planner replied <br />that that would be correct. However, no permission is needed if the fence <br />is placed 2 feet inside the property line. The City Administrator noted that <br />the 2 foot distance is so that there is room for the property owner to <br />maintain the area outside the fence. <br />Fischer asked about a listing of acceptable building materials for the fence. <br />The Planner noted that item 7 in the ordinance lists maintenance free <br />material, such as vinyl, brick, or weather -resistant metal or wood. He <br />suggested that the last line of that provision be reworded to read "Other <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.