Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 <br />The Finance Director noted that the preliminary 2008 Budget document <br />presented to the Council this evening reflects a 0% net levy increase as she <br />has included the use of a large share of the $225,168 in LGA dollars that <br />the City is projected to receive. This would leave a $74,078 surplus. The <br />Director pointed out, however, that LGA allocations are extremely volatile <br />and noted that there is discussion about a revamping of the LGA formula. <br />Therefore, the Director submitted to the Council a list of possible levy <br />scenarios for their consideration in adopting the 2008 Preliminary Budget. <br />Blesener stated that he was worried that the LGA formula would be <br />changed for next year, and the City has no idea at this time what the <br />impact of a changed formula would be. Blesener stated that he was more <br />comfortable with using a small portion of 2008 LGA dollars for tax relief <br />this year. Once the formula change impact is known, the City could take <br />additional action toward tax relief if the City were to remain on the <br />receiving end of LGA. Blesener noted that Little Canada has received no <br />LGA dollars for the past several years. <br />McGraw pointed out that the largest portion of the City's Budget is <br />comprised of public safety. As a result, there are few places within the <br />Budget that significant cuts could be made. McGraw stated that he agrees <br />with the Mayor's comments about using a portion of LGA dollars for tax <br />relief in 2008, with additional evaluation to be made as part of the 2009 <br />Budget. <br />The Council discussed the level of net levy increase that it was <br />comfortable with for the Preliminary 2008 Budget. There was also <br />discussion on the need for caution given that in the past when the State has <br />had budget difficulties, one of the first places it took dollars to balance the <br />State budget was from LGA. Montour suggested that the State may look <br />at the reserve funds of cities and tap those dollars if reserves are too high. <br />Blesener suggested that any LGA dollars not utilized for tax relief in 2008 <br />should be allocated to the General Capital Improvement Fund. <br />The Council discussed in detail whether the preliminary net levy increase <br />for the 2008 Budget should be set at 2% up to 4%. Council acknowledged <br />that between adoption of the Preliminary 2008 Budget and the Final 2008 <br />Budget there would be efforts made to make cuts and reduce the net levy <br />increase. It was noted that once the Preliminary Levy amount is set, the <br />City cannot go over that amount in finalizing the 2008 Budget. <br />McGraw again pointed out the substantial portion of the City's budget <br />dedicated to public safety which limits opportunities for cuts. McGraw <br />stated that given the unpredictability of the State with regard to LGA, he <br />