Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />SEPTEMBER 12, 2007 <br />supported reserving a portion of the City's 2008 LGA allotment until the <br />future of LGA is more certain. He noted that changes the State will make <br />could end up with Little Canada again receiving no LGA. <br />The City Administrator reported that he recently met with a representative <br />of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities as well as other entities <br />and discussed LGA. The Administrator expressed strong concern that <br />Little Canada's 2008 LGA allotment could be one-time dollars, and noted <br />the volatility of LGA and discussion that a formula change is needed. The <br />Administrator pointed out that the City will be dependent on any LGA <br />dollars used to reduce the levy. The Administrator noted the significant <br />LGA cut that the City of St. Paul will receive in 2008 and the fact that <br />Little Canada has received no LGA for several years and is now slated to <br />received over $225,000 in 2008. The Administrator indicated that there is <br />discussion that the Legislature will change the formula. He suggested that <br />until the formula is changed and LGA is a more stable source of revenue, <br />these dollars should be handled very cautiously. <br />The Administrator stated that while his preference would be fora 0% net <br />levy increase for 2008, he is recommending for the preliminary 2008 <br />Budget a 4% net levy increase. He noted that even at this level, $73,000 <br />in LGA will have to be utilized for tax relief which will be dollars that the <br />City will have to make up in the future if LGA goes away again for Little <br />Canada. The Adminisriā€¢ator noted that City staff will continue to fine-tune <br />the 2008 Budget prior to adoption. He also noted that the City may have a <br />better feel for the status of LGA by December when the final budget <br />would be acted upon. <br />Keis noted that the 2007 net levy increase was 2.86% and the City <br />received no LGA assistance. It is difficult to set a preliminary 2008 <br />Budget at a 4% increase when the City is slated Yo received $225,000 in <br />LGA funds for 2008. Keis acknowledged, however, the volatility of LGA <br />and the need to utilize these dollars cautiously at this time. <br />The City Adminisriā€¢ator pointed out that last year the City bought down the <br />2007 net levy increase by utilizing $30,000 in reserves. The result is that <br />the $30,000 has to be made up again in 2008. The Administrator reported <br />that there are some areas of the proposed budget that City staff will <br />evaluate to reduce expenditures further. <br />McGraw stated that the City has used tax dollars very prudently and noted <br />increasing costs related to oil prices, maintenance of City streets, an <br />additional Sheriffls Department Deputy, increasing public safety costs, <br />etc. McGraw stated that the Council has to be prudent in considering the <br />