09-26-07 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 26, 2007 Brendelin reported that it is St. Jude's intent to comply with all the recommendations of the City Planner and City Engineer. Blesener asked if there was anyone from the general public wishing to comment on this matter. Clara Neis, Cobblestone Village, asked about the water tower discussion stating that this is the first time she has heard this. Blesener indicated that the City Council just learned of the potential need for a second water tower. Neis agreed that they have problems with water pressure in this area. Keis noted that the second water tower is one of the options that are being considered at this time. No decision has been made. Neis expressed concern that the Phase II building is very close to Cobblestone Village, noting about a 40 foot setback from the property line, plus an additiona130 feet from the closest townhome and the fact that the building will be very large. Brendelin indicated that additional trees will be added to the buffer. Blesener noted that the elevation of the Cobblestone Village property is higher at about 940. The result is that the Phase II building may be about 20 feet higher than the closest townhome. Blesener again suggested that since the building is not yet planned, St. Jude should consider options such as notching the building or moving it further from the property line. The City Administrator indicated that creation of the TIF District is scheduled for consideration at the Council's October 10`" meeting. He indicated that given the issues of the watermain and utilities, the TIF program could be somewhat altered. The City Planner submitted written findings of fact that support no negative environmental impacts resulting from the St. Jude project. Blesener noted that the Metropolitan Council is reviewing the City's Comprehensive Plan Amendment relative to the St. Jude project. The Planner indicated that the process has begun, and the Met Council is waiting for comments from surrounding communities in order to complete their review. There was no one else present from the general public wishing to comment on this matter. Upon motion by Montour, seconded by Keis, the public hearing was closed. Ms. Allan introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: 4