My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-26-07 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
03-26-07 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:20:55 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 2:19:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 26, 2007 <br />painting. He stated that they would do auto body repair work on vehicles <br />with good drive trains. <br />Keis pointed out that the auto repair work being proposed is much more <br />than what was originally thought. McGraw pointed out that at the <br />Planning Commission meeting the indication was that Voyageur would be <br />doing some part replacement. There was no mention of front end or rear <br />end work. McGraw stated that based on the presentation at the Planning <br />Commission meeting, he did not realize that the request was for major <br />auto repair. McGraw felt that the business changes are quite different <br />from the original intent of the CUP that was approved. <br />Liponiga stated that the extent of the business was presented at the <br />Planning Commission meeting. However, he did not have the benefit of <br />the interior drawings that he presented to the Council this evening. <br />The City Clerk indicated that at the Planning Commission it was presented <br />that an interior lift would be installed. It was not until the Deputy Fire <br />Marshal conducted an inspection of the business several days after the <br />Planning Commission meeting that staff learned that a frame straightening <br />machine was also being proposed. The City Administrator indicated that <br />it is his understanding that the State license for interior retail sales requires <br />that there be interior display spade for five vehicles. <br />Liponiga indicated that even with the lift and the frame straightening <br />machines, five vehicles could be stored in the building. <br />Keis posed the question that if everything is conducted indoors and there <br />is no outdoor storage should the City care. Allan stated that she felt what <br />was proposed was too large for the building, and noted the Deputy Fire <br />Marshal's report which indicates that there is already outdoor storage <br />violations occurring. <br />There was no one present from the general public wishing to comment on <br />this matter. <br />Upon motion by Allan, seconded by McGraw, the public hearing was <br />closed. <br />Ms. Allan inriā¢oduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: <br />RESOLUTIONNO. 2007-3-69 -DENYING THE AMENDMENT TO <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW OUTDOOR STORAGE <br />AS WELL AS MOTOR VEHICLE REPAIR IN CONJUNCTION WITH <br />ANAUTO SALES (INDOOR) LICENSE FOR VOYAGEUR MOTORS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.