My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-14-07 Council Minutes
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
02-14-07 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2009 1:20:37 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 2:21:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />FEBRUARY 14, 2007 <br />Ruff reviewed two bid options noted in the Pre-Sale Report. Option 1 <br />included the 2007 Improvements outlined earlier and requires a bond issue <br />in the amount of $2,205,000. Option 2 adds costs for the Rice Street and <br />County Road B improvements in addition to the 2007 Improvements and <br />requires a bond issue in the amount of $2,770,000. Ruff indicated that <br />staff is recommending Option 1. The bond issue would have aten-year <br />term, and the City would have the ability to pre-pay the bond after five <br />years. <br />Ruff also explained that given the City has not received a bond rating for <br />awhile, Moody's would review the City's current A2 rating. The higher <br />the bond rating, the lower the interest costs to the City. Ruff explained the <br />bond rating system and the review process which includes a review the <br />amount of City debt, wealth of its citizens, employment diversity, City <br />management, and reserve balances. <br />Keis asked why the City is proposing to bond for 2007 Improvement costs <br />when it has not bonded for other improvements in recent years. The City <br />Administrator reported that in recent years the City has financed <br />improvements internally. However, given the size of this improvement, <br />internal financing would put to much strain on the City's reserves. The <br />Administrator pointed out that in addition to bond revenues, some of the <br />other funding sources for this improvement are State and County grant <br />dollars, MSA funds, as well as assessments. <br />Ruff noted that given the cost of improvements in the last several years as <br />well as the financial climate, it was a wise decision to finance those <br />improvements internally. However, at this time, a bond sale is most <br />prudent for the City. <br />Blesener asked for a review of Options 1 and 2. The City Administrator <br />indicated that in addition to the 2007 Improvements, Option 2 adds <br />$600,000 for interim improvements to the Rice Sh•eet/County Road B <br />intersection. The Administrator explained that when Met Council was <br />considering the construction of a park and ride at this intersection, concern <br />was expressed with the functionality of the intersection, the negative <br />impact a park and ride would have on an already difficult intersection, as <br />well as the impact that the St. Jude expansion would have. Based on the <br />St. Jude impact to the intersection, MN DOT was considering interim <br />improvements until such time as the Rice Street Bridge could be <br />reconstructed. Design work for the interim improvements is estimated at <br />$50,000 with the work itself estimated at $550,000. The Administrator <br />indicated that the City offered St. Jude the option of including these costs <br />in the bond issue with St. Jude tax abatement dollars to be used to recover <br />the costs. St. Jude has not agreed to this prior to tonight's meeting. As a <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.