06-27-07 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES CITY COUNCIL JUNE 27, 2007 Blesener pointed out that the City cannot approve a development proposal that would landlock another parcel. Blesener felt that nothing could move forward until Mr. Hanson determines how he will participate. Blesener also pointed out that it is his understanding that Hanson has a long narrow strip of property that currently has some title problems. Hanson indicated that at the time Ontario Lane was developed, the developers squared off their property which left a long narrow strip of land that was given to him. Hanson reported that he has been paying taxes on the property since 1990, however, now it appears that there are some title issues with this parcel that need to be resolved. Blesener again indicated that it is premature to act on the development of the Steinert property until the status of the Hanson property is known. Benning pointed out that the Steinert property could be developed with Lots 1 through 8 without including the Hanson property. The Hanson property could be either added into the development or could be sold in parcels to enlarge the abutting Ontario Lane lots. Therefore, Benning did not feel there was an issue of landlocking the Hanson property. Blesener pointed out that if all the Ontario Lane property owners purchased sections of the Hanson property, it may be beneficial to shift the cul-de-sac further east to enlarge the Steinert lots. Deeper lots would result in more trees being saved. Allan stated that she would like to see as many trees saved as possible. Allan stated that she was puzzled as to how any trees could be saved under the concept that is before the Council this evening. Benning explained that there are two separate groves of pines on the property and explained that the pines on the rear 20 feet of the lots would be saved. Blesener suggested that leaving a 20 foot wide grove of trees on the back of these lots would leave very little room for a backyard. Linda Fund, 2943 Ontario Road, indicated that Mr. and Mrs. Hanson have very generously allowed their neighbors to enjoy the flowers and wildlife on their property over the years. Funk stated that she would be interested in purchasing land from the Hanson's and expanding her backyard. Blesener noted that the Hanson's will have to have a commitment from each of the abutting Ontario Lane property owners to buy land in order to make this option feasible. Montour suggested that the platting of the Steinert property as proposed would not landlock the Hanson property. Blesener noted that the decision Mr•. Hanson makes will impact the Steinert property. Either Hanson will 12