Laserfiche WebLink
engineer of their own. These items needed to be resubmitted by Monday, <br />December 22, 2003. <br />1 /7/04 Letter sent to property owner with reminder on upcoming deadline. <br />1/19/04 Property owner submits new site plan and proposal for storage bins to enclose <br />some of the outdoor storage. <br />2/4/04 Letter sent to property owner requesting a meeting to go tlrrough site plan <br />changes. <br />5/5/04 Memo sent to Planning Commission recapping status of the property. Site still <br />has roughly 102 cars around the property. <br />6/7/04 Letter sent to property owner indicating denial of request for amendment to <br />Conditional Use Permit and Variance. Property owner given until June 30, 2004 <br />to bring property into compliance. <br />6/18/04 Memo to City Council with request from Valor Enterprises to allow 60 days to <br />bring property into compliance. Temporary licenses would be issued with <br />expiration of license on June 30, 2004. <br />6/23/04 Site Inspection and update memo sent to City Council. No access was obtained to <br />the rear yard. The front yard contained 23 cars an increase of 17 cars from May <br />5, 2004. <br />8/24/04 Site Inspection and update memo sent to City Council. Property owner has <br />reduced the number of cars on site down to 51. Of those cars it is determined that <br />none appear to be for sale and all repairables. There was still miscellaneous junk <br />and debris around the site. Property owner was requesting an extension to <br />deadline for compliance. <br />10/22/04 Memo to City Council on inspection set up with property owner. <br />10/26/04 Site Inspection and update memo sent to City Council. Property owner had <br />brought the site into compliance with the number of cars, car storage location, and <br />removal of junk/debris. The site was still evident of a drainage problem and <br />property owner was informed of need to correct drainage and establish <br />appropriate surfacing in rear yard. <br />12/1/04 Letter Sent to property owner because the number of cars on site has increased <br />since compliance was achieved in October 2004. <br />12/7/04 Property owner called indicating that business has expanded it services and now <br />Valor Enterprises is also providing detailing services to customers. <br />6/30/05 Staff Notes on site inspection and discussion with property owner on compliance <br />of property. Staff reminded Mr. Sedaghat of CUP conditions. Staff clearly <br />explained to Mr. Sedaghat that site must remain in compliance continually. It is <br />not acceptable to reduce cars and then increase once inspection is completed. If <br />staff inspects site in the future no further warnings will be given for <br />noncompliance. <br />4/18&27/06 Site inspection. Prom neighboring property staff views roughly 100 cars in the <br />rear yard of the lot. All customer and employee parking spaces are full. Staff <br />believes almost 90% of the cars are repairables, given the condition. The paving <br />and parking requirements were also not completed as approved in the original <br />CUP. <br />5/i/06 Citations issued. <br />Y2evocation ai UUP Process Started - <br />5/18/06 Staff recommends the City Council call for a public hearing to revoke the CUP <br />for 3165-3167 Spruce Street. <br />