Laserfiche WebLink
City staff generally has the right to speak pubiloly as private Citizens on "matters of publio <br />concern," Such speech, even if made in the workplace or as part o&official duties, may be <br />constitutionally proteoted if the interests of the employee, in commenting upon matters of public <br />concern, outweighs a city's interests in promoting the efficiency of the public services it perforans <br />through its employees, Be oaroful to balance these interests before taking any action against an <br />employee for the content of the speech he/she publicizes on social media sites, of course, not <br />everything is defined as a matter of pubilo concern — comments on private matters with no hxnpaot <br />on the greater pubilo generally are not oonsldered protected speech, Cities should consult with <br />their oity attorneys as appropriate on this issue, Staff never has the right to reveal non-publlo or <br />private data, <br />Etiquette guidelines for staff who use social media on a personal basis might include; <br />• Account Names. Personal social media account names should be not be tied to the city, This <br />will help clarify that the individual is not speaking officially on behalf of the city, For example, <br />the personal Twitter account for John Doe, the Mosquito Heights Publio Works Director, <br />should be just "JohnDoe," his Paoebook page "John Doe's" and so on, <br />Staff interested in using social media offiolally on behalf of the city should talk with their <br />supervisor. <br />• Mind the law, existing city policies and gnidalines. Individuals who usepersonal soolal <br />media accounts are not immune from the law, or from the need to follow existing city policies <br />and guidelines related to harassment prevention, media relations, computer use and other <br />policies the oity may have adopted, <br />Individuals should be encouraged to refrain from uploading, posting, transmitting or making <br />available content known to be false, misleading or fraudulent. They should be encouraged not <br />to post photos that infringe on trademark, copyright or patent rights of others, <br />Individuals never have the right to post non-public and confidential information such as <br />information related to coworkers, personnel data, medical information, chins or lawsuits <br />against the city, <br />Individuals should not use city -owned equipment to post to personal sites content that violates <br />existing city policies, that exhibits hate, bias, disorimination, pornography, libelous or <br />otherwise defamatory content, <br />Individuals should be encouraged to post to personal sites only that content which Is suitable <br />for readers and viewers of all ages, <br />What about elected officials who use social media? Same elected officials already use blogs, <br />mloroblogs, Casebook and other social media to connect with constituents and to promote political <br />agendas. This is a reasonable use of soelal media, but eleoted officials should not use official city <br />social media sites for campaigning purposes, just as they would not use the offiolal oity website or <br />newsletter for campaigning, <br />Page 9 of 12 <br />