10-11-07 Planning Comm. Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 11, 2007 Himmelbach noted that three of the proposed lots are in Maplewood and these lots have not yet been approved. Himmelbach asked if the Variance is approved how that will impact the placement of the road. The Planner noted that the City has not conditioned the plat on what happens in Maplewood. However, Little Canada and Maplewood staff are in discussion about sewer and water service for this area. Pechmann reported that he lived on a similar cul-de-sac that was three times the size of the one proposed in another city. This cul-de-sac outlet onto a much busier street than LaBore Road. Pechmann stated that, therefore, he understood the concerns of the neighbors. However, he experienced no problems with traffic safety, emergency vehicle access, etc. in living on this cul-de-sac. Pechmann noted that the City must look at the future development of the area, and felt that without the stub streets to the east and west development of those adjacent properties will be much more difficult. Pechmann stated that he supported the Variance as felt that Code requirements were being met. Knudsen noted the debate about reasonable use of the property under the hardship test in the Subdivision Ordinance. Knudsen noted that without the access points to the east and west there is no access to the neighboring properties. Knudsen agreed with the findings of the City Planner that the Variance is needed to provide reasonable use of the property. Duray noted that the Commission is looking to the future and trying to provide access to adjacent developable properties. This is a requirement of the City Code. The Planner noted that it is a requirement under the Subdivision Ordinance. The City must look forward and consider potential impact of future subdivisions. Knudsen stated that Commissioner Socha had to leave the meeting, but wanted to go on record indicating her support for the City's 500 foot maximum cul-de-sac length. Socha felt there was no hardship present to support the Variance, and, if present, she would vote for denial. Duray noted Quam's comments relative to compromise, and noted that that would have to come from the developer. Duray stated that he would like the Council to consider future code revisions relative to tree preservation. Duray recommended approval of the Variance from the Subdivision Code requirement limiting permanent cul-de-sac length to a maximum of 500 feet as requested by Lauren Development for Richie Place subject to the following findings of fact: -11-