Laserfiche WebLink
~~-~ Metropolita;<a Corzncal <br />J~ <br />August 27, 2007 <br />Joel Hanson, City Administrator <br />City of Little Canada <br />515 Little Canada Road East <br />Little Canada, MN 55117 <br />RE: City of Little Canada Environmental Assessment Worksheet <br />St. Jude Medical Technology Center <br />Metropolitan Council District 11 <br />Metropolitan Council Review No. 20059-1 <br />Dear Mr. Hanson: <br />The Metropolitan Council received the St. Jude Medical Technology Center Environmental <br />Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for review on July 31, 2007. This 47 acre project involves <br />construction of 475,000 square feet ofoffice/laboratory/manufacturing space and 2,460 parking <br />spaces in parking decks. Two existing buildings on site will remain, but 438 existing surface <br />parking spaces will be eliminated. Beginning in 2007, the project will proceed iri three phases. <br />Metropolitan Council staff review of the EAW finds that it is complete and accurate with respect <br />to regional concerns. An Environmental Impact Statement is not necessary for regional <br />purposes. Staff offers the following comments for consideration as.the project is implemented: <br />Item 8 -Permits and Approvals Required (Jim Larsen, 651-602-1159) <br />In accordance with Minnesota Statute Section 473.513, at the time the City makes <br />application to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for a permit to construct <br />the proposed sanitary sewer project component, a copy of the plans, design data, and a <br />location map of the project will also need to be submitted to the Metropolitan Council. <br />The Council's Environmental Service Municipal Services staff will need to review, <br />comment, and reconunend issuance of the construction permit by the MPCA before <br />connection can be made to the City's wastewater disposal system. <br />Item 8-Permits and Approvals Required (Bob Mazanec, 651-602-1330) <br />The EAW indicates that the City has approved a comprehensive plan amendment for this <br />development. The Metropolitan Council, however, has not yet received the plan <br />amendment. The EAW needs to note that the comprehensive plan amendment will be <br />sent to the Metropolitan Council for its statutorily required review. At a minimum the <br />western 10 acres of the site requires an amendment to change its "public" land use <br />designation to an appropriate category consistent with the project proposal: <br />16a i,Jll..il F~ Pv~ld <br />i11ih r a 1~~) <br />www.me[rocouncil.org , ~.._ ~ ~.. <br />V3(~E~~S~~~~i~lli~l's~L.it~le~~a~~,eh~~~:i}~~'Z^ana(~d(S'p~SfJ~~t~V~'~~9~31)1.~8~-1550 TI'Y (651) 291-09(14 <br />An Lqual OPPommity EmPloJer <br />