Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTCS <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />MARCH 23, 2005 <br />°I'he foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Montour. <br />Ayes (5) LaValle, Montour, Blesener, Allan, Keis. <br />Nays (0). Resolution declared adopted. <br />PAR[{ING Blesener reported that he reviewed the listing of streets outlined in the <br />REGULATIONS former Public Works Directors memo dated July 21, 2000 relative to the <br />posting of these streets as no parking. In reviewing that listing, 'Blesener <br />felt that consideration should be given to changing the parking restrictions <br />on the following streets to only one side: <br />arcade Street (County Road D to Keller :Parkway) <br />McMenemy Street (Little Canada Road to Viking Drive) <br />Viking Drive (McMenemy Road to Edgerton Street) <br />County Road I3-2 (Edgerton Street to Arcade Street) <br />131esener fiarther indicated that his Peeling is that traffc safety should be <br />the criteria used for making a decision on whether or not to post parking <br />restrictions on a street, not because the sU eet has been designated as pact <br />of the City's trail system. <br />LaValle noted that there will be increased traffic on the City's streets as <br />the result of the Unweave the Weave project. The Administrator felt that <br />project will result in a dramatic increase in traffic on City streets. <br />Allan agreed that only one side of McMenemy Road and Viking'Drive <br />needed to be posted as no pa~i<ing. She suggested that die west side of <br />McMenemy Road be posted no parking and the south side of Viking Drive <br />be posted as no parking. <br />Flesener felt there was the need to post the east side of McMenemy Road <br />in the area of Sextant as no parking to ensure adectuate traffic visibility. <br />1<eis asked if Blesener felt there would be clot of on-street parking on <br />these streets. Ilesener did not feel there would be, but again stated that <br />whether or not to post streets as no parking should be done from a traffic <br />safety standpoint and not from a trail standpoint. <br />LaValle felt that any streets that will be impacted from the increased <br />traffic from Unweave the Weave should remain posted as no parking until <br />the completion of that project. <br />Allan suggested getting the input from the Parks & Recreation <br />Commission and the Sheriff's Department on this issue. Blesener that he <br />knows the Parla & Recreation Commission will recommend retaining the <br />no parking designation given the use of this street for on-street trails. <br />