My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/08/2016 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
2016
>
06/08/2016 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2022 3:33:59 PM
Creation date
6/7/2016 2:01:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
06/08/2016
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The plans show an extension of 2Is' Avenue south to Cedar Street. The City has spoken to the <br />applicant and has asked that 21 st Avenue be extended to serve the site, but that the connection to <br />Cedar Street not be made until Cedar is improved. The plans generally show dedication of 40 <br />feet of right-of-way (ROW) for 21st Avenue and 33 feet of right-of-way for Cedar Street. A 40 <br />foot'/2 ROW is required for Cedar Street. However, the plans show an exception within the 40 <br />foot'/2 ROW on the northern portion of 21st Avenue. This appears to be an issue with the title <br />work and must be corrected to ensure that the ROW is dedicated to the city with clear title. <br />The applicant provided a traffic study but the analysis not address the AUAR requirements to <br />ensure that the planned improvements to 21st Avenue would be adequate to support the project in <br />advance of the planned connections to Cedar Avenue and Fairview. <br />The applicant has indicated that they wish to construct 215t Avenue as part of this project. The <br />applicant will be responsible for obtaining the full 80 feet of right-of-way and any necessary <br />easements. A 40-foot'/2 right-of-way will be required to be platted with this project and the <br />applicant must obtain a 40-foot easement for streets, drainage and utilities on the Centerville side <br />of the street. The street project will include a crossing over JD3, wetland impacts and floodplain <br />impacts. The applicant will be responsible for obtaining these permits. The City Engineer's <br />memo notes that additional information is required to facilitate these permits. <br />The site plan shows two new accesses for Lot 1. The southern access straddles the lot line <br />between Lot 1 and Outlot B. An access easement agreement between the affected properties <br />must be provide to allow this shared access. <br />The applicant should provide turning radius exhibits to show that the vehicles can maneuver <br />through the site to the docks and to the storage areas. <br />Staff finds that the single access via 2 1 " Avenue would be adequate for the development of Lot 1 <br />and a secondary access is not required. <br />Floodplain <br />A portion of the site (primarily adjacent to JD3) is in the FEMA floodplain. Section 1103 of the <br />City Code provides standards for development in the floodplain. While it does not appear that <br />development of Lot 1 will impact the floodplain, the required improvements to 21 st Avenue will <br />have flood impacts that will require mitigation. The applicant must provide more information, <br />including a Letter of Map Revision and an exhibit showing no net fill, for review and approval. <br />Wetlands <br />There are number of wetlands delineated on site and in the area where the 2Is' Avenue <br />improvements are planned. It appears that there are wetland impacts from the street project and <br />the development on Lot 1. The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is the LGU for the <br />Wetland Conservation Act. At the May 31st meeting with the city and RCWD, the applicant <br />indicated that they intended to prepare a full watershed application on June 61h for a July 27th <br />RCWD board review. <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.