Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Katie Larsen <br />July 6, 2016 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> K:\02988-200\Admin\Plan Review 06-20-16\20160706 Engineering Review #2 United Properties.docx <br />extension RCWD is requiring a wetland sequencing plan for the roadway alignment all <br />the way to Cedar. The applicant is to work through the process with the RCWD. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br /> <br />1. The AUAR review was completed and comments are provided within a memo to Katie <br />Larson dated June 28, 2016, enclosed. The items to be addressed: <br /> <br />· A conservation easement shall be included on the south side of Clearwater Creek <br />that is 150 feet in width a majority of the creek length and reducing down near the <br />drive isle (east end); and on the north side of the creek it shall be 50 feet measured <br />from the Top of Bank. <br />· The development area is within an area with high potential for archeological sites. <br />The applicant will need to complete a Phase I Archeological Survey. <br />· Clearwater Creek is designated as a Public Ditch and the applicant should apply <br />to RCWD for impacts to this ditch. <br /> <br />WATER SYSTEM <br /> <br />1. The proposed hydrant spacing exceeds 300 foot and should be revised. Fire hydrants <br />shall be added along 21st Avenue from the existing watermain every 300 feet. These <br />shall be located behind the future trail. The City’s Deputy Director of Fire should review <br />the final spacing. <br /> <br />2. The watermain loop around the building shall be 8 inch diameter and shall have valves <br />every 600 to 800 feet. <br /> <br />SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM <br /> <br />1. The sanitary sewer crossing at Clearwater Creek casing pipe shall be detailed on the plans <br />with the type and elevations. <br /> <br />2. The sanitary service cleanout needs to be labeled on the plans. <br /> <br />STORM SEWER SYSTEM <br /> <br />1. Storm pipe not meeting minimum grade for flushing (3fps) are as follows: 12” pipe <br />between CB 216 and CBMH 215, 12” pipe between CBMH 211 and CBMH 209. (Sheet <br />C2.2) <br /> <br />2. Storm pipe material (RC) not identified on plans. (Sheet C2.2) <br />3. The arch pipe crossing the proposed roadway should be identified as 122-inch Span Arch <br />Pipe (this is the appropriate 96-inch diameter equivalent). 122-inch span arch apron on <br />either side will need to have sheet piled end section and trash guard. (Sheet C3.1) <br />