Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION August 1, 2016 <br />APPROVED <br />136 space — he wonders, is it the best we can do with this land. Ms. Larsen explained that the <br />137 developer is maximizing just as was done by the Spirit Hills developer; the lots meet all <br />138 the city's requirements. Mr. Stimson asked the council not to gloss over the 500 foot <br />139 maximum called for in a cul-de-sac; just because the city can, should we? He offered <br />140 thanks to the council for hearing comments and recalled when he moved into the <br />141 neighborhood there were sixteen trips per day in front of his home. He asked the city <br />142 when his street would no longer be a dead end and it ended up being shortly after he <br />143 moved in. He doesn't want a similar situation with the discussion about access at Totem <br />144 Trail — that it just doesn't happen. Mayor Reinert added that this is an opportunity. Mr. <br />145 Stimson added that he fears a real speed problem at the straight area coming in. Mayor <br />146 Reinert said his communication with County Commissioner Sivarajah has indicated that <br />147 more discussion on a Totem Trail access is possible and he'd like to see that happen when <br />148 it is viable. <br />149 <br />150 Council Member Kusterman asked about the possibility of adding sidewalks for safety <br />151 and Mr. Grochala remarked that it would probably be a hearty neighborhood discussion. <br />152 <br />153 A resident of the area recalled her experience moving to a quiet street and the huge <br />154 difference in traffic when access to Birch changed. She feels this would be another huge <br />155 change. She suggests also that it would be a similar rude awakening for people who buy <br />156 on this cul-de-sac to find an access change in the future. <br />157 <br />158 The council concurred that they support going down the path of gaining more information <br />159 on plans for traffic in the area. It would also be nice to know a little more about the <br />160 homes that would be going in also. The item was pulled from Monday night's agenda. <br />161 <br />162 Council Member Maher asked about the process of how developments come forward. <br />163 She heard there was information including on past Friday updates but she didn't seem to <br />164 get that and she had difficulty answering questions posed by residents previous to tonight. <br />165 Mayor Reinert suggested that sometimes in the past the council gets an update when a <br />166 development is going to the Planning and Zoning Board; that has been helpful and he'd <br />167 prefer that. Director Grochala explained that staff has generally done that with a PUD <br />168 development and have typically felt it best to bring forward a development such as this <br />169 when the review and more information is in place. The council has generally been <br />170 informed earlier in the form of the weekly update document. <br />171 <br />172 2. Public Safety Department Fleet — Public Safety Director Swenson and numerous <br />173 Public Safety staff members were present. Director Swenson reviewed a PowerPoint <br />174 presentation that included information on the following (presentation on file): <br />175 <br />176 - Police Division — overview of method for size (industry accepted is use and <br />177 average per miles per year); average miles for past few years were noted; <br />178 - Administration and Investigation Vehicles, seven are included in current fleet; <br />179 - Reserve and Community Service — two vehicles that are not fully equipped; there <br />180 is also a snowmobile; <br />0 <br />