My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08-08-2016 Council Packet*
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
08-08-2016 Council Packet*
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 8:53:59 AM
Creation date
10/11/2016 10:32:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
08/08/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES July 25, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br />5 <br />- A proposal for a guard shack and the city’s requirements for such a structure; (Council Member 181 <br />Manthey asked if that means there will be fencing and the developer representatives indicated 182 <br />that fencing is planned on the south side; compliance with city ordinance would be required); 183 <br />- Parking plans (that will exceed city minimums); 184 <br />- Preliminary plat compliance with standards, right/of/way dedication plans are included, and 185 <br />easements that will be required; 186 <br />- A tree preservation plan will be required; 187 <br /> 188 <br />Staff is recommending approval of the requests with the conditions outlined in the report. 189 <br /> 190 <br />Mayor Reinert recalled comments he’s heard from the council as they’ve considered this development 191 <br />specifically related to the type of trucks involved, noise and screening. Ms. Lindahl recalled discussion 192 <br />at the staff level about screening; it was well reviewed before being brought forward for official review. 193 <br />She indicated on a site view how a berm and staggered evergreens will be utilized to screen areas around 194 <br />the building and block noise. The Planning and Zoning Board did not have particular concerns and 195 <br />indicated that the matter was well considered in the plans. Noise mitigation was a big consideration as 196 <br />staff worked with the developers on their plans. Council Member Maher suggested that lighting can be 197 <br />a concern and Ms. Lindahl explained that there is a lighting plan and there is language in the city code 198 <br />that provides protection; there will be a relative condition coming back with the final PUD plans. 199 <br /> 200 <br />Regarding Ordinance No. 07-16, Council Member Rafferty moved to approve the 1st Reading of the 201 <br />ordinance as presented. Council Member Manthey seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice 202 <br />vote. 203 <br /> 204 <br />Regarding Resolution No. 16-76, Council Member Maher noted a portion of the staff report that requires 205 <br />compliance to certain items and she wonders when those are due. Community Development Director 206 <br />Grochala explained that the council will be seeing a final review/action consideration that will include 207 <br />that information. Council Member Rafferty moved to approve Resolution No. 16-76 as presented. 208 <br />Council Member Maher seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 209 <br /> 210 <br />6B) Woods Edge: 211 <br />i. Consider Second Reading of Ordinance No. 06-16, Amending Ordinance No. 04-04, 212 <br />Section 2.A., Lino Lakes Town Center Design & Development Guide 213 <br /> 214 <br />ii. Consider Resolution No. 16-74 Approving Summary Publication 215 <br />of Ordinance No. 06-16 216 <br /> 217 <br />Kendra Lindahl, Landform, reported on the item. The council is considering 2nd Reading of this 218 <br />ordinance; a full presentation was done at the last council meeting. 219 <br /> 220 <br />Mayor Reinert recalled discussion about building materials; he recognizes the quality of the materials 221 <br />that staff is recommending but he’s having difficulty understanding that the vinyl siding now being 222 <br />recommended is better than the Hardie board-type siding that the council originally felt was the best 223 <br />quality option. Council Member Rafferty concurred that there remains a question that the vinyl siding 224 <br />being suggested is the top of the line in the industry right now; however, he noted that all the 225
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.