Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES October 10, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br />3 <br /> 91 <br />6B) Consider Resolution No. 16-128, Order the Project, Approving the Plans & Specifications 92 <br />and Authorizing the Ad for Bid, 2016 Surface Water Management Project - City Engineer 93 <br />Hankee noted that the resolution approves the City’s 2016 Surface Water Management Project. Sites 94 <br />included in this project are selected based on feasibility and public input. The project is preferred to 95 <br />be done in the late fall. She noted the project budget and, if approved, that the council will receive 96 <br />the results of a bid process in the near future. 97 <br /> 98 <br />Council Member Kusterman asked if this is the type of work that could be done by city staff. Ms. 99 <br />Hankee explained that staff is involved to a certain level, including assisting with impacts on property 100 <br />owners. Past that it is appropriate to outsource this work. 101 <br /> 102 <br />Council Member Manthey asked if the project is always within the allotted budget and Ms. Hankee 103 <br />explained that there is an established list and they work toward completing that list as much as they 104 <br />can within the budget. 105 <br /> 106 <br />Council Member Manthey moved to approve Resolution No. 16-128 as presented. Council Member 107 <br />Kusterman seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 108 <br /> 109 <br />6C) Consider Resolution No. 16-129, Accepting and Approving the Grant Agreement between 110 <br />the City of Lino Lakes and the Metropolitan Council of Environmental Service for the 111 <br />Improvement of Publically Owned Infrastructure - City Engineer Hankee noted that the resolution 112 <br />authorizes staff to accept and approve an agreement related to receipt of funds to support a sewer 113 <br />lining project within the Shenandoah neighborhood. Ms. Hankee explained that the Metropolitan 114 <br />Council has identified the city as eligible for the grant and the eligibility doesn’t mean the city is 115 <br />mandated in any way at this time. 116 <br /> 117 <br />Council Member Kusterman moved to approve Resolution No. 16-129 as presented. Council 118 <br />Member Rafferty seconded the motion. Motion carried on a voice vote. 119 <br /> 120 <br />6D Consider Resolution No. 16-80, Approving a Minnesota Department of Transportation 121 <br />Final Layout, State Project 6284-172 I-35W North Corridor Improvements - Community 122 <br />Development Director Grochala reviewed the request before the council to approve a project on 123 <br />Highway I-35W, extending into Lino Lakes. The project scope was reviewed, including: 124 <br />- the area involved; 125 <br />- the addition of a lane in each direction 126 <br />- the inclusion of a MnPass Lane 127 <br />- spot improvements. 128 <br /> 129 <br />He reviewed the project funding and proposed schedule. A map was shown indicating the spot 130 <br />improvements. Noise walls are proposed to extend into Lino Lakes (a picture indicating the type of 131 <br />wall proposed was shown). The project layout was reviewed including the type of improvement that 132 <br />would occur on the Lino Lakes’ portion of the project. The Lino Lakes’ portion of this project would 133 <br />be rolled ahead from plans to do it at a later date. The noise wall process includes a vote of the 134 <br />residents and that is underway (with resident approval anticipated). Since the project extends into 135