My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-12-2016 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2016
>
12-12-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2018 9:57:33 AM
Creation date
1/6/2017 1:32:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/12/2016
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION November 7, 2016 <br />DRAFT <br />1 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES 1 <br />MINUTES 2 <br /> 3 <br />DATE : November 7, 2016 4 <br />TIME STARTED : 6:00 p.m. 5 <br />TIME ENDED : 8:50 p.m. 6 <br />MEMBERS PRESENT : Council Member Rafferty, Kusterman, 7 <br /> Maher, Manthey and Mayor Reinert 8 <br />MEMBERS ABSENT : None 9 <br />10 <br />Staff members present: City Administrator Jeff Karlson; Public Safety Director Swenson; 11 <br />Community Development Director Grochala; City Engineer Diane Hankee; Finance 12 <br />Director Sarah Cotton; City Planner Katie Larsen. 13 <br /> 14 <br />1. DEA Task Force Officer - Public Safety Director Swenson reviewed the staff 15 <br />report that recaps information relating to the city’s participation in the DEA Task Force, 16 <br />including size of the task force, represented cities, and impact on the local community. 17 <br />Council Member Kusterman asked if the assigned officer has any regular duties with the 18 <br />Lino Lakes Police Department and Director Swenson explained that the officer’s work 19 <br />does augment the work of the department but his specific duties are exclusively tied to the 20 <br />work of the task force; his wages and benefits are paid by the task force. 21 <br /> 22 <br />The council discussed the ability of another community to send an officer to the task 23 <br />force; Director Swenson said that’s certainly possible but he noted that the City won’t see 24 <br />the same benefits if another community’s officer is assigned. For instance, in one case 25 <br />the involvement and tools of the task force brought a local matter to a federal prosecution 26 <br />level. 27 <br /> 28 <br />Council Member Manthey asked about the impact on the department’s narcotics work 29 <br />and Director Swenson explained how the city would have to take on the work. The task 30 <br />force has also produced forfeiture funds that assist the department in law enforcement; the 31 <br />Chief feels the department is solid but the participation in the task force has benefited 32 <br />from that collaboration. Council Member Manthey expressed concern about the loss of 33 <br />the benefits to the city. Council Member Kusterman remarked that he would have 34 <br />expected that drug arrests in the city would go up with task force participation rather than 35 <br />down and Director Swenson explained that the numbers go down because the cases 36 <br />actually become federal matters and don’t show in the state statistics that the city uses. 37 <br /> 38 <br />It was clarified that, should the city end the provision of an officer to the task force, the 39 <br />city would not lose outstanding forfeited funds that are pending in the court system. 40 <br /> 41 <br />Mayor Reinert noted that the city has participated with the task force efforts by providing 42 <br />an officer for five years and he believes it’s time for another community to step forward. 43 <br />It is a budget matter that will be considered at the next budget work session. 44 <br />45
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.