My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-05-2016 Council Work Session Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2016
>
12-05-2016 Council Work Session Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2021 11:56:15 AM
Creation date
1/12/2017 3:22:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/05/2016
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORK SESSION <br />December 5, 2016 <br />APPROVED <br />132 <br />133 Mr. Hoska received thanks from the council for the input from the Legion. <br />134 5. Public or Space Needs Analysis and Existing Facility Audit Proposal - <br />135 Public Services Director DeGardner introduced Architect Quinn Hutson, CNH <br />136 Architects, who was requested to prepare some initial information about a public works <br />137 facility proposal. <br />138 <br />139 Mr. Hutson reviewed his prepared report (included in the council packet). Basically a <br />140 proposal would include looking at current facilities, a discussion of current needs and <br />141 how to meet future needs. It would look at options: renovating current facilities, <br />142 building a new facility at the current site, and new facilities at a different site (probably <br />143 near the new fire station). A report would provide useful data to assist with future <br />144 council discussions. <br />145 <br />146 Mayor Reinert asked about the cost of a feasibility study and Mr. Hutson said $11,900. <br />147 Director DeGardner remarked that he feels the proposal is fair. Mayor Reinert said he's <br />148 most interested in hearing about improvements to the current facility; this is a small city <br />149 and he thinks it would be difficult to foot the bill for a new building at this time. <br />150 Council Member Manthey remarked that he would insist on seeing those three options <br />151 without favor to one. Council Member Kusterman remarked that the three options are <br />152 good because they all involve city owned land and that would keep costs down. Council <br />153 Member Rafferty added that he understands that information is good but he questions <br />154 what is needed at this time; he doesn't see the city approving an expensive construction <br />155 project at this time. <br />156 <br />157 The council concurred with proceeding with the study. <br />158 6. Pavement Ratings and Proposed 2017 Mill and Overlay Project -City <br />159 Engineer Hankee explained that every year the City updates its pavement ratings in order <br />160 to have good information for street maintenance project decisions. She provided a map <br />161 of the proposed 2017 Road Improvement Project. The rating information allows staff to <br />162 make recommendations for those streets that will benefit most from maintenance <br />163 activities. She reviewed the type of work that would be included in the maintenance <br />164 projects. If the council concurs with the projects proposed, staff would go forward for <br />165 bids. Council Member Manthey noted the north side of the city where there are many <br />166 streets that need work; how can residents understand the recommendations that don't <br />167 include them? Engineer Hankee explained the recommendation, including the presence <br />168 of new development and she recommended that people should feel free to contact her <br />169 with any questions. <br />170 7. Vehicle Replacement Schedule -Administrator Karlson recalled previous <br />171 council discussions on this matter. Public Safety Director Swenson reported that after <br />172 conversations with Mr. Karlson and input from the city mechanic, he is proposing a <br />173 change to the replacement plan. With the mechanic's review information, they are <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.