|
CITY OF LINO LAKES
<br />RESOLUTION NO. 16-169
<br />RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2017
<br />COMPENSATION PLAN FOR NON-UNION EMPLOYEES
<br />WHEREAS, Section 207.04 of the Code of Ordinances requires the City Administrator to
<br />establish and maintain a compensation plan for all positions in the City, which is to be reviewed
<br />and approved by the City Council; and
<br />WHEREAS, this plan is in compliance with Minnesota Statute 471, which is referred to as the
<br />Pay Equity Law; and
<br />WHEREAS, the compensation plan for non-union employees includes a two and a half percent
<br />(2.5%) wage increase, effective January 1, 2017.
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes that
<br />the following salary schedule by adopted.
<br />City of Lino Lakes 2017 Compensation Plan
<br />Effective January 1, 2017
<br />Position
<br />Minimum
<br />Monthly
<br />Step 2
<br />Step 3
<br />Step 4
<br />Step 5
<br />Maximum
<br />Monthly
<br />City Administrator
<br />$9,419
<br />$9,889
<br />$10,360
<br />$10,831
<br />$11,302
<br />$11,773
<br />Public Safety Director
<br />$8,289
<br />$8,704
<br />$9,118
<br />$9,533
<br />$9,947
<br />$10,362
<br />Finance Director
<br />$7,785
<br />$8,174
<br />$8,564
<br />$8,953
<br />$9,342
<br />$9,731
<br />Public Serv. Director
<br />$7,697
<br />$8,081
<br />$8,466
<br />$8,851
<br />$9,236
<br />$9,621
<br />Comm. Dev. Director
<br />$7,502
<br />$7,877
<br />$8,252
<br />$8,628
<br />$9,003
<br />$9,378
<br />Dep. Public Safety Dir.
<br />$7,261
<br />$7,624
<br />$7,987
<br />$8,350
<br />$8,713
<br />$9,076
<br />Public Safety Captain
<br />$6,786
<br />$7,126
<br />$7,465
<br />$7,804
<br />$8,144
<br />$8,483
<br />HR Manager
<br />$6,220
<br />$6,531
<br />$6,842
<br />$7,153
<br />$7,464
<br />$7,775
<br />City Clerk
<br />$5,109
<br />$5,364
<br />$5,619
<br />$5,875
<br />$6,130
<br />$6,386
<br />Adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council this 12th day of December 2016.
<br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Council Member
<br />Kustermanand was duly seconded by Council Member Manthey and upon vote being
<br />taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
<br />Kusterman, Manthey, Maher, Rafferty,
<br />The following voted against same:
<br />none
<br />ATTEST:
<br />is ne Bartell, City
<br />1
<br />Jerk
<br />Jeff Reinert, a or
<br />
|