My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/08/1996 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1996
>
01/08/1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2017 11:52:20 AM
Creation date
6/23/2017 2:07:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
01/08/1996
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Lino Lakes <br />Park Board Meeting <br />Monday, November 6, 1995 <br />Trails Committee: Marty gave background on a trails committee. He <br />said much discussion concerning the planning, maintenance, <br />development, safety, and funding of trails has transpired over the <br />last few years, and with added resolve from the 20/20 Vision Focus it <br />was decided at the last Park Board meeting to investigate the <br />formation of a Trails Committee. Marty said he was directed to make <br />a recommendation on this. <br />He gave the board copies of the City of Shoreview's Resolution <br />forming a Trails Committee, and the City of Vadnais Heights <br />Ordinance, establishing a Trails Commission. Both groups are charged <br />with making recommendations concerning trails. <br />Marty pointed out a couple of differences. He said Shoreview has 11 <br />members on thein committee, and meets once a month, and Vadnais <br />Heights meets on a quarterly minimum schedule with five members. <br />Shoreview indicated that meeting once a month was too much, they <br />simply ran out of agenda items after awhile. Vadnais Heights had 5 <br />members with city staff members acting as liaisons and representing <br />the Planning, Park and Public Safety aspects of trails. Shoreview, <br />indicated that it became very difficult to create liaisons to each <br />other committee from existing committee members because after awhile <br />liaisons simply do not show up for lengthy periods of time. They are <br />now re-evaluating this process. <br />Marty recommended that the Park Board establish a committee of five <br />members with staff liaisons to meet on a quarterly basis, unless <br />otherwise needed basis. <br />The criteria of the committee was discussed. It was decided that <br />there should be one person from the 20/20 Advisory Group, one person <br />from the Park Board, and the other three members should have an <br />interest or background on trails and they should be chosen from a <br />geographic cross-section of the city. All members will have voting <br />rights. <br />Joe asked how the Trail Committee would be established. George said <br />it would be done on a staff level. It would be published in the <br />City's legal newspaper. Marty said people that have shown an <br />interest in a trails committee would also be contacted. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.