My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/12/1996 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1996
>
02/12/1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2017 12:46:06 PM
Creation date
6/23/2017 2:52:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
02/12/1996
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 22, 1996 <br />Council Member Kuether said that this was brought up at the Wednesday work session <br />and asked if anyone had called Mr. Brixius and asked him about this. Mr. Ahrens said <br />that he had called and talked to Mr. Brixius on Thursday morning. Mr. Brixius said that <br />Brandywood was prior to him working for the City as a consultant. Mr. Ahrens said that <br />generally Mr. Brixius does not get involved any sort of financial arrangement between the <br />developer and the City. Council Member Kuether said that she was talking to Ms. Dahl <br />and asked Mr. Ahrens what was he using for the basis for this conversation. Mr. Ahrens <br />said he did not know but Mr. Brixius said that he does not get involved in financial <br />situations, that this is generally between the City Engineer and the developer. Council <br />Member Kuether asked if Mr. Brixius is saying that he did not talk to Ms. Dahl? Mr. <br />Ahrens did not ask if he talked to Ms. Dahl. He just asked him if he had any background <br />on this and if so what was the background. Council Member Neal asked that Mr. Brixius <br />attend a Council meeting so that the Council can speak with him on this matter. <br />Ms. Dahl said to Mr. Schumacher that even if he made a mistake and forgot about it and <br />cannot go back , it would still be written into the Brandywood development agreement <br />and there would also be a letter of credit which would be in that file. She said that it <br />would not just mysteriously disappeared or fly away by itself. If he forgot is immaterial, <br />it would still be there and the City would at least know the name of the bank. Council <br />Member Kuether replied if it was there to begin with (in the beginning). Mr. Ahrens said <br />that the developer agreement in the Brandywood file referenced construction costs within <br />the plat itself and he did not see any reference to a letter of credit for 12th/Holly. Ms. <br />Dahl asked if there was a reference to a letter of credit for 12th/Holly in the developers <br />agreement. Mr. Ahrens said no. <br />Council Member Kuether asked Mr. Hawkins if this letter of credit "rang a bell" for him. <br />Mr. Hawkins said no that generally he did not get involved with development contracts, <br />Ms. Wyland does handles these matters. <br />Mayor Landers said that it is his opinion that Ms. Wyland and Mr. Brixius should come <br />before the City Council to answer these questions. Council Member Neal suggested that <br />a meeting be held at City hall with all persons involved in this issue. Mayor Landers said <br />he was in favor of such a meeting because there are unanswered questions. Council <br />Member Kuether said that she did not want it to sound that the City lost $250,000.00 <br />because she was sure that this did not happen. <br />Ms. Dahl said that the City made one step forward in paying for the utilities on Birch <br />Street just to go three (3) steps back with $1,952,000.00 road issue. The $20,000.00 <br />feasibility report was to determine the type of road improvements and costs stated. The <br />traffic study which cost the City another $1,500.00 or more, reported that the Trapper's <br />Crossing will generate 70% of the traffic in the usage of this road. She said, therefore, <br />the conclusion can only be Trapper's Crossing share will be 70% of the $1,952,000.00. <br />Ms. Dahl said Chapter 429 as mentioned at the Council work session is just a smoke <br />screen and has no bearing on this existing PDO and preliminary plat agreement. She said <br />that she believes that it is not the job or duty of the staff to renegotiate an existing <br />PAGE 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.