My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
04/22/1996 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
1996
>
04/22/1996 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2017 12:41:33 PM
Creation date
6/30/2017 10:05:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
04/22/1996
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dave Ahrens, P.E. <br />City Engineer <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />April 18, 1996 <br />Page 3 <br />Option F: <br />Option F provides for the reconstruction of Elm Street from Grey Heron Drive to <br />Trunk Highway 49. Elm Street would be realigned from approximately Cinnamon <br />Teal Court. At this point, Elm Street would curve northerly and then relatively <br />quickly turn easterly to provide for an intersection with Lake Drive, approximately <br />300 feet north of the existing intersection of Elm Street and Lake Drive. Access to <br />the school would be provided in two locations; one location would be provided near <br />the existing 4th Avenue location. This access would be primarily for car traffic. The <br />second access would be provided on Elm Street opposite of Grey Heron Drive. This <br />access would be used primarily by bus traffic. There is some staff parking available <br />and also deliveries that would be utilizing this access. This option would provide for <br />a four -lane divided roadway between 4th Avenue and Trunk Highway 49. The <br />roadway would then transition from a four -lane roadway to a two-lane roadway at <br />Cinnamon Teal Court. Turn lanes would be provided as required at Grey Heron <br />Drive and the school entrance to provide adequate traffic flow through this <br />intersection. It is anticipated that this option would warrant a signal at the time the <br />school becomes operational. An appealing aspect of this option is that it provides <br />a signal on Trunk Highway 49 at a point more conducive to pedestrian crossings that <br />would be accessing the middle school site. This option does have an increased <br />impact on the neighborhood above and beyond options A and B. It should be noted <br />that a majority of the traffic will be using the eastern access to the school, thereby <br />minimizing the impact to the residential area south of Elm Street. At this time, it <br />is anticipated that 75 to 80% of the trips generated by the school will be utilizing the <br />eastern access to the school. <br />Funding: <br />Has been a paramount issue in all of the options explored. It is important the City <br />retain State Aid eligibility on Elm Street. All of the options provided do maintain <br />that State Aid eligibility on Elm Street. It should be noted that Option D does <br />provide for a roadway that would not be State Aid eligible and would have to be <br />funded solely by the school and adjacent property owners. <br />PEDESTRIAN ISSUES <br />The Centennial School District has indicated that their standard policy is to bus all students <br />outside of a one mile radius of the school site. The exception in this case is that the school <br />district has indicated that they will bus all students on the east side of Trunk Highway 49. <br />The primary reason that bussing will be provided to these individuals is the safety aspect of <br />pedestrian crossings of Trunk Highway 49. Centennial School District has indicated that <br />H:\5666.00\CIVIL\CORRES\D419 6DA <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.