Laserfiche WebLink
Honorable Mayor and <br />Members of the City Council <br />City of Lino Lakes <br />Compliance and Other Matters <br />As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the City's financial statements are free of <br />material misstatement, we performed tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, <br />contracts, and grant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on <br />the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with <br />those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. <br />The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to <br />be reported under Government Auditing Standards. <br />During the course of our audit, several items came to our attention that we feel could be addressed by <br />the City of Lino Lakes to more efficiently run the City's operations or improve its internal controls. We <br />herein submit the following suggestions to the City of Lino Lakes for their consideration. <br />Auditor Comments: <br />Capital Project Deficits <br />The financial statements for the capital project funds are presented in Statements 3, 5, 12, and 13 of the <br />2008 Annual Financial Report. As of December 31, 2008, four capital project funds have deficit fund <br />balances equaling a combined deficit of $1,716,501. While this is an on-going comment, we would like <br />to recognize the significant improvements made related to fund balance deficits over the past four <br />years. The following describes the status of each of these funds: <br />- One of the deficits is very typical for any city operating a TIF fund (TIF 1-11). This fund showed <br />positive operating results with revenues in excess of expenditures of $60,435 for 2008. <br />- "fhe second deficit is simply a timing difference between expenditures and the related MSA <br />funding source (CSAG 14/8 Reconstruction Project). As anticipated, this fund will continue to run <br />a deficit until the project nears completion and the MSA revenue is recognized. <br />- The third has specifically been addressed by the Council and a plan is being implemented to <br />reduce the deficit over the near future (Dedicated Parks). This fund showed positive operating <br />results with revenues in excess of expenditures of $60,480 for 2008. <br />- The fourth deficit is from the 135E Interchange Fund. The fund was new during 2008 and <br />incurred one expense. This is a County project and at this time the City does not know the final <br />plans of the project. <br />Area and Unit Charge Fund <br />On January 11, 1988, the City Council approved Resolution 1-88, which established the Area and Unit <br />Charge Fund for the City. The purpose of this fund is to collect various area and unit charges to be used <br />to meet debt payments. Before October 1 of each year, the City estimates the required transfer needed <br />to meet debt payments for the subsequent year. In December, these estimated amounts are transferred <br />to the various debt funds. We recommend that the City continue to closely monitor actual versus <br />projected area and unit assessment collections to assure that debt payment requirements will be met. <br />Designations of balances required for debt service is necessary to define discretionary construction <br />balances available to the City. The financing plan for the following bond issues have pledged area and <br />unit charges for the repayment of debt service: <br />• Improvement and Utility Bonds of 2004A <br />• Water Revenue Bonds of 1999B <br />• Water Revenue Bonds of 1996B <br />(2) <br />