My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
02/08/1995 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
1995
>
02/08/1995 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2017 12:30:05 PM
Creation date
7/7/2017 9:16:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
02/08/1995
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table J shows the adjustments to the available residential acres <br />within the MUSA as tabulated 1 January 1994 by subtracting net <br />residential land absorption occurring during 1994 and adjusting the <br />NWI wetlands to be reflective of actual wetland experiences. Year <br />end 1994, the City estimates 444 acres of buildable residential <br />MUSA remaining. <br />TABLE J <br />YEAR END 1994 AVAILABLE RESIDENTIAL MUSA <br />Available acres within MUSA as of 1/1/94 895 <br />Available acres used in 1994 on a per lot <br />basis (from "Net Available Acres Used") - 41 <br />Available acres within MUSA as of 1/1/95 854 <br />Additional wetland from "Actual Wetland <br />Acres to NWI Based Wetland Acres Ratio" <br />(1.5 * 820 acres NWI - 820 acres) <br />- 410 <br />Adjusted available acres within MUSA <br />as of 1/1/95 444 <br />In addition to the limited supply of buildable land, the location <br />of this land further complicates urban growth. The City's supply <br />of buildable MUSA is scattered throughout the community, however, <br />the largest contiguous parcels are located east of I-35 and along <br />Main Street. These parcels are located away from existing <br />infrastructure. The extension of utilities is difficult without a <br />development having the critical mass for financing both the utility <br />extension and the internal plat improvements. This is required due <br />to the Charter restriction that prevents the assessing of utilities <br />without the permission of adjoining property owners. This <br />situation stalls growth and does not promote contiguous growth <br />patterns or the orderly extension of utilities. <br />Anoka County assessment policy of valuing vacant buildable land <br />having a MUSA designation at $2,000 per acre higher than rural <br />service property suggests a financial vested interest in the MUSA <br />designation. Land trades that would remove the MUSA from one area <br />of the City for use in another is seen as taking value away from <br />the property. The City is reluctant to become involved with taxing <br />issues and compensation for lost value. <br />A final discrepancy between Metropolitan Council's estimate of <br />available MUSA and the City is that Met Council included land areas <br />in oversized unsewered lots as land available for development. The <br />City's calculation for available MUSA excludes any unsewered lots <br />of single ownership having land areas less than 5 acres. The basis <br />for this proposal is as follows: <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.