My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/12/1994 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
1994
>
01/12/1994 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2017 12:21:55 PM
Creation date
7/7/2017 10:34:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
01/12/1994
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
63
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Residential Densities. Development in the subject area is <br />characterized by unsewered residential subdivisions within 24 <br />acre lots. While the Behms development proposes urban size <br />lots (10,800 square feet), the property's containment of <br />numerous wetlands significantly reduces the overall <br />development density. In large part, such environmental <br />features have established parameters both for the <br />subdivision's density and physical design. In response to <br />such features, dwelling unit clusters are separated and <br />dispersed throughout the subject property. Also to be noted <br />is the City's requirement that minimum lot areas exclude <br />wetlands. In this regard, the density proposed (1.62 DU/AC) <br />may be lessened further. <br />The issue of urban versus rural density is a matter frequently <br />deliberated by City Officials. In this regard, the City may <br />wish to consider established precedent in earlier dealings of <br />a similar nature. <br />The subdivision under consideration exhibits a low residential <br />density with dwelling units dispersed throughout the 94.5 acre <br />site. The site's natural features (i.e., vegetation, <br />wetlands) have prompted the use of cul-de-sacs within the <br />subdivision design. The use of such cul-de-sacs should <br />minimize any possible adverse impacts upon area property <br />owners. <br />3. Phasing Plan. As shown on Exhibit H, the proposed subdivision <br />is to be developed in six phases. The phased development <br />approach will effectively reduce the subdivision's short term <br />development density and will allow the developer to respond to <br />area market demands. The Planning Commission must evaluate <br />the density impact where smaller lots abut the larger lots and <br />the density impact on streets in the area. <br />4. Existing R-1 Zoning District. A portion of the subject site <br />(southeastern area) currently holds an R-1, Single Family <br />Residential Zoning Designation. The R-1 zoning provides for <br />sewered, urban sized (10,800 square feet) residential lots. <br />Public Services. To accommodate the proposed development, public <br />sewer service will be necessary. As part of the City's <br />consideration of the proposed development, the following utility <br />service related items should be considered: <br />1. Septic System Failures. As noted previously, sewage treatment <br />system failures have been documented in the area. Such <br />facilities raise genuine public health concerns in regard to <br />potential ground water pollution. While such systems likely <br />require replacement, associated costs may make such action <br />difficult. The ultimate solution to failing systems may be <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.