Laserfiche WebLink
In spite of this positive change, two lots within the Revised <br />Preliminary Plat do not meet minimum lot area requirements <br />exclusive of wetland area: Lots 13 and 14 of Block 1. Lot 13 <br />encompasses ±10,175 square feet and Lot 14 encompasses only ±8,600 <br />square feet outside of the wetland area. In order for said Lots 13 <br />and 14 to meet lot area standards, wetland mitigation efforts will <br />be necessary. In this regard, a wetland mitigation plan should be <br />submitted subject to review and approval by the City and Rice Creek <br />Watershed District. <br />Lot Width. At the time of original Preliminary Plat review, three <br />lots were noted as having insufficient lot widths. The Revised <br />Preliminary Plat has corrected this problem so that all lots are <br />now in conformance with required lot width standards. <br />Lot Depth. Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 21, Block 2 contained <br />insufficient lot depths at the time of original Preliminary Plat <br />review. They have since been eliminated and instead combined with <br />adjacent lots to conform with the required 145 foot lot depth <br />standard. <br />Lot Configuration. The orientation of all lots shown on the <br />Revised Preliminary Plat appear to be acceptable. Lot 6, Block 3 <br />has been eliminated, thus the problems of access, isolation, and <br />lot area as associated with this lot no longer exist. <br />Wetlands. The proposed plat (original and/or revised) has not been <br />reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District as is required by <br />ordinance. Their comments, as well as a wetland mitigation plan <br />showing revised wetland boundaries and acreages should be submitted <br />to the City for review. Any approval of the Preliminary Plat <br />should be contingent upon these occurrences. <br />Streets. <br />1. Street Vacation, As _part of the 6 December 1993 Planning <br />Report it was stated that the vacation of the north half of <br />62nd Street will be required to accommodate the proposed plat. <br />Providing it does not land lock any existing parcels, staff <br />does not believe a through street in this location is <br />necessary to accomplish the City's transportation objectives. <br />Specific justification for the vacation exists in recognition <br />of area wetland and street intersection locations. <br />2. Street Easement. Since the initial plat review, it was <br />realized that a parcel of land south of the Fox Trace plat <br />would be without access if the entire length of 62nd Street <br />right-of-way were eliminated. Thus, further consideration <br />should be given to this matter and vacation of the street <br />should not occur until provision is made which allows public <br />street access to the parcel(s) on the south side of 62nd <br />Street. <br />2 <br />