My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
05/11/1994 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
1994
>
05/11/1994 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2017 12:26:11 PM
Creation date
7/7/2017 11:01:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
05/11/1994
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Pli' lnni ng and zoning open mike <br />May 11, 1994 <br />I'd like to express my concern about the direction of <br />future growth in Lino Lakes. While we ci nt stop growth <br />overall, we do have ways to control its spread within our own <br />city limits. The tool for accomplishing this is ci'tlled zoning. <br />Few decisions made by city officials cary more impact than <br />those regarding zoning. People looking for a place to live <br />make one of the most important decisions of their lives based <br />on zonign. Some may choose an area because it is close to where <br />they work, shop or go to school. Others may prefer a more <br />rural atmosphere or a hobby farm. It is lrevistating to the <br />people who have made such important choices and life -time investments <br />when, without much if any warning or apparent reason, the city <br />decides to rezone the area. <br />There have been situations in recent years when city <br />officials have appeared insensitive to the disruption and frustration <br />that zoning changes can cause. Sometimes notification <br />about proposed changes have failed to reach the people most <br />affected. until drastic changes become "done deals". Sometimes <br />reasons for making the change have not been explained. Sbmetimes <br />the people involved have not been consulted or their arguments <br />in opposition seriously considered. Often the stock response <br />to peoples opposition from the city is that development is <br />inefitable and that if they don't like it , simply move away. <br />Most people understand that changes in zoning may <br />occasionally become necessary. I suggest that guidelines for <br />making such changes be de follows: <br />» . Look for alternatives. If none are apparent notify all <br />residents who would be affected in writing- preferably <br />certified mail of the proposed zoning change. <br />2. Before any decisions are made allow 3 months for further <br />evllustion after residents are notified. <br />3. Hold a public hearing to explain in detail why the change <br />is necessary. <br />4. If controversy continues, meeti with opponents on site <br />to better underttand their concerns. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.