My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/13/1993 P&Z Packet
LinoLakes
>
Advisory Boards & Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Board
>
Packets
>
1993
>
01/13/1993 P&Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/7/2017 12:17:54 PM
Creation date
7/7/2017 12:05:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
P&Z
P&Z Document Type
P&Z Packet
Meeting Date
01/13/1993
P&Z Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Planning & Zoning Board <br />December 9, 1992 <br />CITY OF LINO LAKES <br />PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MINUTES <br />................................................................ <br /><'><D ecember>9i <br />ESENT Golbmann, Landers: <br />Robinson, Schaps;> <br />alone <br />City Engineer Schneider, Planning <br />Consultant Brixius, Planning Coordinator <br />Wyland <br />I. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL: <br />II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: <br />Al Robinson moved approval of the minutes of the November <br />14, 1992 meeting as submitted and was supported by John <br />Landers. All voted aye. Motion carried. <br />III. OPEN MIRE: No one was present to speak at Open Mike. <br />IV. ACTION ITEMS: <br />A. 92-50 & 92-51 CUP, Adams Outdoor Advertising, Public <br />Hearing, I-35E/Co. Rd. 14, and I-35W/Lake Drive <br />Planning Consultant Brixius reviewed the staff report <br />which explained that this is a request to construct two <br />advertising signs - one located at the north/east corner <br />of I -35E and Co. Rd. 14, and the other on the north side <br />of I35W just east of the Lino Industrial Park. <br />Mr. Brixius explained that although the signs can meet <br />all the requirements of the Sign Ordinance for a GB <br />Zoning District, a 1990 Land Use Study for the I -35W and <br />I -35E Interchange Areas recommend against the placement <br />of billboards within both study areas. Staff would <br />recommend denial of the application based on the <br />inconsistency of the request with the adopted Land Use <br />Study and other comments contained in the staff report. <br />Mr. John Bodger, representing Adams Outdoor Advertising, <br />was present and stated that all requirements of the Sign <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.