01/13/1993 P&Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

Planning & Zoning Board December 9, 1992 Ordinance can be meet. He indicated that he has an agreement with the property owners to remove the signs within 90 days of development of either site. These particular applications have been submitted three times since 1988 - the previous two times the requests were denied because of studies being conducted and/or possible developments occurring in the vicinity. Adams would just like to put the signs up until development occurs. Mr. Tom Schutte, representing the owner of the 34 acre parcel north of the I -35E site was present to voice concern about the proposed request. He indicated that the piece of property the sign will be located on is approximately 1 3/4 acres in size and marginal in terms of development possibility (mostly wetland) - therefore, the potential is there that the sign will never be removed because the property will never be developed. He added that this sign location could affect development of his larger parcel to the north. Tom Mesich stated that if the I -35E property is not developable, we do not want to locate a sign on this site with no option for removal. After some discussion Kathleen Nordine made a motion denying Conditional Use Permit 92-50 and 92-51 based on the recommendation in the Land Use Study for the Interchange Areas/Comprehensive Plan and comments outlined in the staff report and also the question as to whether the I -35E site is, indeed, a buildable site. Monica Slatten seconded the motion. All voted aye. Motion carried to deny requests as submitted. B. Shores of Marshan Lake, Relocation of Recreation Trail Mary Kay Wyland explained that the developer is asking the City to approve the relocation of the platted recreation trail. The staff and Park Board have reviewed the request and after much discussion developed three options outlined in the staff report. The Park Board and staff concurred on Option 1 which was to have the City pursue a Corps of Engineers permit for the relocated trail on the lake side - on the approximate "oxcart trail" location closer to the lake than presently platted, with the developer financing the costs and with the City working with Braurer and Associates on obtaining the permit. Option 2 as recommended by the Staff was to have the trail remain as platted (this was Option 3 of the Park Board) , and Option 3 as recommended by the Staff was to relocated the trail just off the street row on lots 8-12 with connections to a lake side trail between Lots 12 & 13 and Lots 7 & 8 (this was Option 2 as 2